Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099494›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Provision of essential evidence-based interventions during facility-based childbirth: cross-sectional observations of births in northeast Nigeria.

Josephine Exley, Claudia Hanson, Nasir Umar, Barbara Willey, Abdulrahman Shuaibu, Tanya Marchant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Josephine ExleyDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Josephine.Exley@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-0854
Claudia HansonDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nasir UmarDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Barbara WilleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abdulrahman ShuaibuThe Executive Secretary, Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria.
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4228-4334
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBGombe State University · NGKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo measure the provision of evidence-based preventive and promotive interventions to women, and subsequently their newborns, during childbirth in a high-mortality setting. DESIGN AND

participantsCross-sectional observations of care provided to women, and their newborns during the intrapartum and immediate postpartum period using a standardised checklist capturing healthcare worker behaviours regarding lifesaving and respectful care.

settingTen primary healthcare facilities in Gombe state, northeast Nigeria. The northeast region of Nigeria has some of the highest maternal and newborn death rates globally.

main outcome measuresData on 50 measures of internationally recommended evidence-based interventions and good practice.

results1875 women were admitted to a health facility during the observation period; of these, 1804 gave birth in the facility and did not experience an adverse event or death. Many clinical interventions around the time of birth were routinely implemented, including provision of uterotonic (96% (95% CI 93% to 98%)), whereas risk-assessment measures, such as history-taking or checking vital signs were rarely completed: just 2% (95% CI 2% to 7%) of women had their temperature taken and 12% (95% CI 9% to 16%) were asked about complications during the pregnancy.

conclusionsThe majority of women did not receive the recommended routine processes of childbirth care they and their newborns needed to benefit from their choice to deliver in a health facility. In particular, few benefited from even basic risk assessments, leading to missed opportunities to identify risks. To continue with the recommendation of childbirth care in primary healthcare facilities in high mortality settings like Gombe, it is crucial that birth attendant capacity, capability and prioritisation processes are addressed.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricParturitionChildCross-Sectional StudiesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNigeriaPregnancymaternal medicineprimary carequality in health care

Identifiers

PMID33099494
PMCPMC7590366
OpenAlexW3093826539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.