Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33100710›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2020

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Prophylactic Voriconazole and Fluconazole Regarding Prevention of Post-hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Invasive Fungal Infection and Its Related Death: A Single Center Experience.

Amro Mohamed Sedky El-Ghammaz, Maha El-Zimaity, Amal Mostafa Elafifi, Essam Abdelwahed, Mohamed Mahmoud Moussa, Yasmin Ahmed Aboelmagd, Mohamed Gamal Kotob, Hebatullah Magdy Fares

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Septic Obturation of a Knee Endoprosthesis Caused byPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amro Mohamed Sedky El-GhammazClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1567-7511
Maha El-ZimaityClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2221-968X
Amal Mostafa ElafifiClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Essam AbdelwahedClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed Mahmoud MoussaClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Yasmin Ahmed AboelmagdClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed Gamal KotobClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hebatullah Magdy FaresClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ain Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnalyzing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of voriconazole versus fluconazole prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

methodsThe research included 70 patients; 34 undergoing allogeneic HSCT and 36 undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), alternated to receive either voriconazole or fluconazole prophylaxis for 180 days on a 1:1 basis. Patients were monitored for occurrence of invasive fungal infections (IFI), IFI-related death (IRD) and total death events. Cost-effectiveness of both agents in both groups was also assessed.

resultsAntifungal prophylactic drug had no impact on incidence of IFI and IRD in both allogeneic HSCT and ASCT (

conclusionsVoriconazole does not differ from fluconazole regarding its efficacy in prevention of IFI and IRD and does not improve OS and FFS in both allogeneic HSCT and ASCT settings. Voriconazole is cost-effective regarding protection from IFI and IRD in allogeneic HSCT but not cost-effective in ASCT.

Indexed as

Antifungal prophylaxisCost-effectivenessHematopoietic stem cell transplantationInvasive fungal infectionInvasive fungal infection-related death

Identifiers

PMID33100710
PMCPMC7573062
OpenAlexW3006815472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.