ReviewKidney international reports2020
Quality of Care for Acute Kidney Disease: Current Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions.
Review in Kidney international reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of a high-risk kidney function trajectory class after acute kidney injury.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Creatinine Decline Rate as a Predictor of Renal Recovery After Acute Kidney Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Holistic Patient-Centered Outcomes in Post-Acute Kidney Injury Care: Physical, Emotional, Cognitive, and Social Outcomes.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025Review
- Identification and outcomes of acute kidney disease in patients presenting in Bolivia, Brazil, South Africa, and Nepal.PLoS medicine · 2024Article
- Recent Update on Acute Kidney Injury-to-Chronic Kidney Disease Transition.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Review
- Posthospital Multidisciplinary Care for AKI Survivors: A Feasibility Pilot.Kidney medicine · 2023Article
- Transitions of dialysis status and outcomes after the unplanned first dialysis: a nationwide population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Care: Protocol for the Randomized Acute Kidney Injury in Care Transitions Pilot Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Kidney Dysfunction After Acute Heart Failure: Is Acute Kidney Disease the New Acute Kidney Injury?Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Acute Kidney Disease After Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Real-world Health Data and Precision for the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury, Acute-on-Chronic Kidney Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease: Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Associated With Less Outcome Risk in Patients With Acute Kidney Disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Acute kidney injury in the critically ill: an updated review on pathophysiology and management.Intensive care medicine · 2021Review
- Assessment of Acute Kidney Injury and Longitudinal Kidney Function After Hospital Discharge Among Patients With and Without COVID-19.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Impact of Early Nephrology Referral on the Outcomes of Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) are common complications in hospitalized patients and are associated with adverse outcomes. Although consensus guidelines have improved the care of patients with AKI and AKD, guidance regarding quality metrics in the care of patients after an episode of AKI or AKD is limited. For example, few patients receive follow-up laboratory testing of kidney function or post-AKI or AKD care through nephrology or other providers. Recently, the Acute Disease Quality Initiative developed a consensus statement regarding quality improvement goals for patients with AKI or AKD specifically highlighting efforts regarding quality and safety of care after hospital discharge after an episode of AKI or AKD. The goal is to use these measures to identify opportunities for improvement that will positively affect outcomes. We recommend that health care systems quantitate the proportion of patients who need and actually receive follow-up care after the index AKI or AKD hospitalization. The intensity and appropriateness of follow-up care should depend on patient characteristics, severity, duration, and course of AKI of AKD, and should evolve as evidence-based guidelines emerge. Quality indicators for discharged patients with dialysis requiring AKI or AKD should be distinct from end-stage renal disease measures. Besides, there should be specific quality indicators for those still requiring dialysis in the outpatient setting after AKI or AKD. Given the limited preexisting data guiding the care of patients after an episode of AKI or AKD, there is ample opportunity to establish quality measures and potentially improve patient care and outcomes. This review will provide specific evidence-based and expert opinion-based guidance for the care of patients with AKI or AKD after hospital discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.