Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106997›Full record

SynthesisReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2021

Cardiovascular risk factors in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maleesa M Pathirana, Zohra Lassi, Anna Ali, Margaret Arstall, Claire T Roberts, Prabha H Andraweera

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maleesa M PathiranaAdelaide Medical School and The Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5817-4156
Zohra LassiAdelaide Medical School and The Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-6334
Anna AliFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7832-1694
Margaret ArstallFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-6382
Claire T RobertsAdelaide Medical School and The Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9250-2192
Prabha H AndraweeraAdelaide Medical School and The Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. prabha.andraweera@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-8370
Lyell McEwin Hospital · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUBasil Hetzel Institute · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize evidence on conventional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among women with previous Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019118149). PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched. Studies reporting on CVD risk factors in women with previous GDM compared to women without previous GDM were selected. A total of 139 studies were eligible, of which 93 were included in the meta-analysis. Women with previous GDM have significantly higher systolic blood pressure (2.47 mmHg 95% CI 1.74 to 3.40, n = 48, 50,118 participants) diastolic blood pressure (1.89 mmHg 95% CI 1.32 to 2.46, n = 48, 49,495 participants), BMI (1.54 kg/m

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes, GestationalBlood PressureFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansPregnancyRisk FactorsCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular risk factorsGestational diabetesWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID33106997
OpenAlexW3093592557

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.