Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108446›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022

An optimal kernel-based multivariate U-statistic to test for associations with multiple phenotypes.

Y Wen, Qing Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Y WenDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Qing LuDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Computational Efficient Statistical Tools for Analyzing Substance Dependence Sequencing DataR01DA043501 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LU, QING · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Methods and Software for High-dimensional Risk Prediction ResearchR01LM012848 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LU, QING · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043501NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Set-based analysis that jointly considers multiple predictors in a group has been broadly conducted for association tests. However, their power can be sensitive to the distribution of phenotypes, and the underlying relationships between predictors and outcomes. Moreover, most of the set-based methods are designed for single-trait analysis, making it hard to explore the pleiotropic effect and borrow information when multiple phenotypes are available. Here, we propose a kernel-based multivariate U-statistics (KMU) that is robust and powerful in testing the association between a set of predictors and multiple outcomes. We employed a rank-based kernel function for the outcomes, which makes our method robust to various outcome distributions. Rather than selecting a single kernel, our test statistics is built based on multiple kernels selected in a data-driven manner, and thus is capable of capturing various complex relationships between predictors and outcomes. The asymptotic properties of our test statistics have been developed. Through simulations, we have demonstrated that KMU has controlled type I error and higher power than its counterparts. We further showed its practical utility by analyzing a whole genome sequencing data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study, where novel genes have been detected to be associated with imaging phenotypes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticComputer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypeGene-set association analysisMultiple phenotypesMultivariate U-statisticsNon-additive effectsOptimal kernel functions

Identifiers

PMID33108446
PMCPMC9291634

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.