Evidence mapPaperPMID 33109133Full record

SynthesisBMC urology2020

Risk factors for incident delirium among urological patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE summary of findings.

L Sanyaolu, A F M Scholz, I Mayo, J Coode-Bate, C Oldroyd, B Carter, T Quinn, J Hewitt

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L SanyaoluDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. SanyaoluLN@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-6986
A F M ScholzDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
I MayoDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
J Coode-BateAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
C OldroydInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
B CarterDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
T QuinnInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J HewittDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-operative delirium is an important, yet under-researched complication of surgery. Patients undergoing urological surgery may be at especially high risk of POD, as they are often older, and interventions can be associated with conditions that trigger delirium. The main aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available evidence for risk factors in this patient group.

methodsFive databases were searched (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychInfo) between January 1987 and June 2019. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess for risk of bias. Pooled odds ratio or mean difference (MD) for individual risk factors were estimated using the Mantel-Haenzel and inverse variance methods.

resultsSeven articles met the inclusion criteria, giving a total population of 1937. The incidence of POD ranged from 5 to 29%. Three studies were deemed low risk of bias and four at a high risk of bias. Nine risk factors were suitable for meta-analysis, with age (MD 4.314 95% CI 1.597, 7.032 p = 0.002) and the clock drawing test (MD - 2.443 95% CI - 3.029, - 1.857 p < 0.001) having a statistically significant association with POD in pooled analyses.

conclusionDelirium is common in urological patients. This review has identified a lack of studies in this surgical population, with wide heterogeneity and high risk of bias. It also highlights a number of potential risk factors for post-operative delirium, of which some are modifiable. However, the strength of evidence is weak at present and so future research should focus on assessing comparable risk factors in this patient group in order to inform future clinical practice. Review registration The review protocol was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (reference CRD42017054613).

Indexed as

Urologic Surgical ProceduresDeliriumHumansIncidencePostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsDeliriumElderlyEpidemiologyUrology

Identifiers

PMID33109133
PMCPMC7590461
OpenAlexW3097916422

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.