ReviewFrontiers in neurology2020
Central Nervous System Involvement as Outcome Measure for Clinical Trials Efficacy in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myotonic dystrophy family registry. The patient experience.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Short-term course of the neuropsychological profile in myotonic dystrophy type 1: a 12-month longitudinal study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Development of an AAV-delivered microRNA gene therapy for myotonic dystrophy type 1.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Multisystem Symptoms in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: A Management and Therapeutic Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Myotonic dystrophies: an update on clinical features, molecular mechanisms, management, and gene therapy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Cognitive impairment, neuroimaging abnormalities, and their correlations in myotonic dystrophy: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Review
- Editorial: Sleep disorders in neuromuscular diseases: treatable conditions: the evolving scenario of sleep in neuromuscular disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Automatic Text-Mining Approach to Identify Molecular Target Candidates Associated with Metabolic Processes for Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Fluid Biomarkers of Central Nervous System (CNS) Involvement in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (DM1).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Shedding light on motor premanifest myotonic dystrophy type 1: A molecular, muscular and central nervous system follow-up study.European journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Longitudinal Changes in Neuropsychological Functioning in Japanese Patients with Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: A Five Year Follow-Up Study.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2023Article
- Cell type-specific abnormalities of central nervous system in myotonic dystrophy type 1.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Brain Pathogenesis and Potential Therapeutic Strategies in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing evidences indicate that in Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 (DM1 or Steinert disease), an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder caused by a (CTG)n expansion in DMPK gene on chromosome 19q13. 3, is the most common form of inherited muscular dystrophy in adult patients with a global prevalence of 1/8000, and involvement of the central nervous system can be included within the core clinical manifestations of the disease. Variable in its severity and progression rate over time, likely due to the underlying causative molecular mechanisms; this component of the clinical picture presents with high heterogeneity involving cognitive and behavioral alterations, but also sensory-motor neural integration, and in any case, significantly contributing to the disease burden projected to either specific functional neuropsychological domains or quality of life as a whole. Principle manifestations include alterations of the frontal lobe function, which is more prominent in patients with an early onset, such as in congenital and childhood onset forms, here associated with severe intellectual disabilities, speech and language delay and reduced IQ-values, while in adult onset DM1 cognitive and neuropsychological findings are usually not so severe. Different methods to assess central nervous system involvement in DM1 have then recently been developed, these ranging from more classical psychometric and cognitive functional instruments to sophisticated psycophysic, neurophysiologic and especially computerized neuroimaging techniques, in order to better characterize this disease component, at the same time underlining the opportunity to consider it a suitable marker on which measuring putative effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. This is the reason why, as outlined in the conclusive section of this review, the Authors are lead to wonder, perhaps in a provocative and even paradoxical way to arise the question, whether or not the myologist, by now the popular figure in charge to care of a patient with the DM1, needs to remain himself a neurologist to better appreciate, evaluate and speculate on this important aspect of Steinert disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.