Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138784›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2020

A structured collaborative approach to intervention design using a modified intervention mapping approach: a case study using the Management and Interventions for Asthma (MIA) project for South Asian children.

Monica Lakhanpaul, Lorraine Culley, Noelle Robertson, Emma C Alexander, Deborah Bird, Nicky Hudson, Narynder Johal, Melanie McFeeters, Charlotte Hamlyn-Williams, Logan Manikam and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Monica LakhanpaulPopulation, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. m.lakhanpaul@ucl.ac.uk.
Lorraine CulleySchool of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.
Noelle RobertsonClinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK.
Emma C AlexanderPaediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Centre and Mowatlabs, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Deborah BirdChild Development Team, Ealing Services for Children with Additional Needs, West London NHS Trust, Carmelita House, 21-22 The Mall, Ealing, W5 2PJ, UK.
Nicky HudsonSchool of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.
Narynder JohalParent representative, Leicester, UK.
Melanie McFeetersSpecialised Commissioning, NHS England and NHS Improvement, Midlands Region, Fosse House, 6 Smith Way, Grove Park, Enderby, Leicester, LE19 1SX, UK.
Charlotte Hamlyn-WilliamsCenter for Health Services and Clinical Research, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Logan ManikamAceso Global Health Consultants Ltd., 3 Abbey Terrace, London, SE2 9EY, UK.
Yebeen Ysabelle BooPopulation, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Maya LakhanpaulFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Mark R D JohnsonFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Mary Seacole Research Centre, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.
De Montfort University · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College Hospital · GBNHS EnglandUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWest London Mental Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research, Health Services and Delivery Research 09/2001/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo describe how using a combined approach of community-based participatory research and intervention mapping principles could inform the development of a tailored complex intervention to improve management of asthma for South Asian (SA) children; Management and Interventions for Asthma (MIA) study.

methodsA qualitative study using interviews, focus groups, workshops, and modified intervention mapping procedures to develop an intervention planning framework in an urban community setting in Leicester, UK. The modified form of intervention mapping (IM) included: systematic evidence synthesis; community study; families and healthcare professionals study; and development of potential collaborative intervention strategies. Participants in the community study were 63 SA community members and 12 key informants; in-depth semi-structured interviews involved 30 SA families, 14 White British (WB) families and 37 Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) treating SA children living with asthma; prioritisation workshops involved 145 SA, 6 WB and 37 HCP participants; 30 participants in finalisation workshops.

resultsTwo key principles were utilised throughout the development of the intervention; community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles and intervention mapping (IM) procedures. The CBPR approach allowed close engagement with stakeholders and generated valuable knowledge to inform intervention development. It accounted for diverse perceptions and experiences with regard to asthma and recognised the priorities of patients and their families/caregivers for service improvement. The 'ACT on Asthma' programme was devised, comprising four arms of an intervention strategy: education and training, clinical support, advice centre and raising awareness, to be co-ordinated by a central team.

conclusionsThe modified IM principles utilised in this study were systematic and informed by theory. The combined IM and participatory approach could be considered when tailoring interventions for other clinical problems within diverse communities. The IM approach to intervention development was however resource intensive. Working in meaningful collaboration with minority communities requires specific resources and a culturally competent methodology.

Indexed as

AsthmaWhite PeopleChildCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchAsthma managementCollaborativeCommunity based participatory researchIntervention mappingMinority ethnic researchTailored

Identifiers

PMID33138784
PMCPMC7607819
OpenAlexW3095117680

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.