Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33139788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the hypoglycaemic effect of pulsatile administration of human insulin in rats.

Makoto Miyazaki, Mariko Hayata, Noriaki Samukawa, Kazunori Iwanaga, Junya Nagai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Makoto MiyazakiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Education and Research Center for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1094, Japan. miyazaki@gly.oups.ac.jp.
Mariko HayataDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Education and Research Center for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1094, Japan.
Noriaki SamukawaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Education and Research Center for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1094, Japan.
Kazunori IwanagaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Education and Research Center for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1094, Japan.
Junya NagaiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Education and Research Center for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1094, Japan.
Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the plasma insulin (INS) concentration-time course and plasma glucose concentration-time course during and after pulsatile INS administration to rats was characterized using a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model. A total INS dose of 0.5 IU/kg was intravenously injected in 2 to 20 pulses over a 2-h period. Compared with the single bolus administration, the area under the effect-time curve (AUE) increased depending on the number of pulses, and the AUEs for more than four pulses plateaued at a significantly larger value, which was similar to that after the infusion of a total of 0.5 IU/kg of INS over 2 h. No increase in plasma INS concentration occurred after pulsatile administration. Two indirect response models primarily reflecting the receptor-binding process (IR model) or glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) translocation (GT model) were applied to describe the PK-PD relationship after single intravenous bolus administration of INS. These models could not explain the observed data after pulsatile administration. However, the IR-GT model, which was a combination of the IR and GT models, successfully explained the effects of pulsatile administration and intravenous infusion. These results indicate that the receptor-binding process and GLUT4 translocation are responsible for the change in AUE after pulsatile administration.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinModels, BiologicalRatsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID33139788
PMCPMC7608663
OpenAlexW3095905164

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.