Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33144698›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2021

Tumour treating fields therapy for glioblastoma: current advances and future directions.

Ola Rominiyi, Aurelie Vanderlinden, Susan Jane Clenton, Caroline Bridgewater, Yahia Al-Tamimi, Spencer James Collis

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 174 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Health-related quality of life and its determinants in patients with malignant brain tumors: a prospective longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuromodulation in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ola Rominiyi *Weston Park Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, The University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK. o.rominiyi@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-0224
Aurelie Vanderlinden *Weston Park Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, The University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Susan Jane ClentonDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Caroline BridgewaterDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Yahia Al-TamimiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-2728
Spencer James CollisWeston Park Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, The University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK. s.collis@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7874-1891
Weston Park Cancer Centre · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12102National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/T001895/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/T002093/1Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) 151681Sheffield Hospitals Charity (Sheffield Hospitals Charitable Trust) STH: 21181; URMS: 164490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumour in adults and continues to portend poor survival, despite multimodal treatment using surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The addition of tumour-treating fields (TTFields)-an approach in which alternating electrical fields exert biophysical force on charged and polarisable molecules known as dipoles-to standard therapy, has been shown to extend survival for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, recurrent GBM and mesothelioma, leading to the clinical approval of this approach by the FDA. TTFields represent a non-invasive anticancer modality consisting of low-intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate-frequency (100-300 kHz), alternating electric fields delivered via cutaneous transducer arrays configured to provide optimal tumour-site coverage. Although TTFields were initially demonstrated to inhibit cancer cell proliferation by interfering with mitotic apparatus, it is becoming increasingly clear that TTFields show a broad mechanism of action by disrupting a multitude of biological processes, including DNA repair, cell permeability and immunological responses, to elicit therapeutic effects. This review describes advances in our current understanding of the mechanisms by which TTFields mediate anticancer effects. Additionally, we summarise the landscape of TTFields clinical trials across various cancers and consider how emerging preclinical data might inform future clinical applications for TTFields.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicElectric Stimulation TherapyGlioblastomaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID33144698
PMCPMC7884384
OpenAlexW3095995374

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.