Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145131›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Comparison of the Efficacy of Tramadol and Paroxetine in the Management of Premature Ejaculation.

Muhammad Fazal Ur Rehman, Ali Imran Zaidi, Tanveer Ul Haq, Shoaib Rafique, Farman Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Fazal Ur RehmanUrology, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Multan, PAK.
Ali Imran ZaidiUrology, Multan Institute of Kidney Diseases, Multan, PAK.
Tanveer Ul HaqUrology, Multan Institute of Kidney Diseases, Multan, PAK.
Shoaib RafiqueUrology, Multan Institute of Kidney Diseases, Multan, PAK.
Farman AliInternal Medicine, District Headquarter Hospital, Khanewal, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of tramadol and paroxetine in the treatment of primary premature ejaculation (PE). Study design This study was a randomized controlled trial performed in the outpatient department of Nishtar Hospital, Multan, from January 2017 to January 2018. Methodology One hundred six patients were diagnosed with PE and included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups receiving either tramadol or paroxetine through a lottery randomization method. The main variables were baseline PE, baseline satisfaction after intercourse, baseline intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), ejaculation control, difficulty in ejaculation, and after-treatment satisfaction with sexual intercourse and IELT. We used IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) for data analysis, and p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Ejaculation control, difficulty in ejaculation, and distress due to ejaculation in patients in the tramadol group was noted as 24.5%, 7.5%, and 7.5%, respectively. Ejaculation control, difficulty in ejaculation, and distress due to ejaculation in the paroxetine group was noted as 49.1%, 17%, and 24.5%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant within the groups at baseline and after treatment of PE (p<0.001). Conclusion Tramadol is an effective and useful drug as compared to paroxetine for the treatment of PE. Tramadol can be used as an alternative to other medications for the treatment of lifelong PE.

Indexed as

latency time.paroxetinepremature ejaculationtramadol

Identifiers

PMID33145131
PMCPMC7599037

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.