Trial reportDiabetologia2021
A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding safety and tolerability study of the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes.
Trial report in Diabetologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02000817 (A Single Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Repeat Dose, Dose Escalating Study Investigating Safety, Tolerability Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and the Beta-Cell Preserving Effect of Otelixizumab in New-Onset, Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Repeat Dose, Dose Escalating Study Investigating Safety, Tolerability Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and the Beta-Cell Preserving Effect of Otelixizumab in New-Onset, Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunomodulatory interventions in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis revealing paradoxical dissociation between beta-cell preservation and glycemic control.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in treating patients with type 1 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies in treatment of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endocrine · 2024Pooled it
- Toward Disease-Modifying Therapies in Type 1 Diabetes: Focus on Teplizumab.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- scFv-based biologics in diabetes: from therapeutic potential to clinical prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Application of monoclonal antibodies in diabetes: A bibliometric analysis from 2004-2024.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Are We Ready With Prevention for Type 1 Diabetes?Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Review
- Type 1 Diabetes: A Guide to Autoimmune Mechanisms for Clinicians.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Review
- Immunosuppressive agents in diabetes treatment: Hope or despair?World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- Immunotherapies for prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes.Immunotherapy · 2025Review
- Immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes: Novel pathway to the future ahead.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Inflammation in diabetes complications: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.MedComm · 2024Review
- Review
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as a possible intervention to delay the onset of type 1 diabetes: A new horizon.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Review on Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) as a Therapeutic Approach for Type 1 Diabetes.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Review
- Induction of long-term tolerance to a specific antigen using anti-CD3 lipid nanoparticles following gene therapy.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Article
- Teplizumab in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Review.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisNumerous clinical studies have investigated the anti-CD3ɛ monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in individuals with type 1 diabetes, but limited progress has been made in identifying the optimal clinical dose with acceptable tolerability and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose-response, safety and tolerability, beta cell function preservation and the immunological effects of otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes.
methodsIn this randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, 24 month study, conducted in five centres in Belgium via the Belgian Diabetes Registry, participants (16-27 years old, <32 days from diagnosis of type 1 diabetes) were scheduled to receive placebo or otelixizumab in one of four dose cohorts (cumulative i.v. dose 9, 18, 27 or 36 mg over 6 days; planned n = 40). Randomisation to treatment was by a central computer system; only participants and bedside study personnel were blinded to study treatment. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, and laboratory measures and vital signs. A mixed-meal tolerance test was used to assess beta cell function; exploratory biomarkers were used to measure T cell responses.
resultsThirty participants were randomised/28 were analysed (placebo, n = 6/5; otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 9/8; otelixizumab 18 mg, n = 8/8; otelixizumab 27 mg, n = 7/7; otelixizumab 36 mg, n = 0). Dosing was stopped at otelixizumab 27 mg as the predefined EBV reactivation stopping criteria were met. Adverse event frequency and severity were dose dependent; all participants on otelixizumab experienced at least one adverse event related to cytokine release syndrome during the dosing period. EBV reactivation (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 2/9; 18 mg, n = 4/8: 27 mg, n = 5/7) and clinical manifestations (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 0/9; 18 mg, n = 1/8; 27 mg, n = 3/7) were rapid, dose dependent and transient, and were associated with increased productive T cell clonality that diminished over time. Change from baseline mixed-meal tolerance test C-peptide weighted mean AUC CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationA metabolic response was observed with otelixizumab 9 mg, while doses higher than 18 mg increased the risk of unwanted clinical EBV reactivation. Although otelixizumab can temporarily compromise immunocompetence, allowing EBV to reactivate, the effect is dose dependent and transient, as evidenced by a rapid emergence of EBV-specific T cells preceding long-term control over EBV reactivation.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02000817.
fundingThe study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.