ReviewBMC health services research2020
Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework.
Review in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- When should electronic medical records reminders for cancer screening stop?-Results from a national physician survey.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Trial
- Entrepreneurial Activity Among Independent Urology Groups.Medical care · 2026Article
- Novel approach to the codesign of a tailored intervention bundle: applying theory with pragmatism.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Adherence With Diagnostic Stewardship Guidance and Sociodemographic Characteristics in the PICU.Hospital pediatrics · 2026Article
- Heavy Metal Toxicity in Clinical and Environmental Health: Sources, Mechanisms, Diagnostics, and Evidence-Based Management of Mercury, Lead, Cadmium, and Arsenic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Exploring Patterns of D-Dimer Assay Ordering at an Australian Rural Referral Hospital: A Retrospective Audit.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Potential Overtesting of Nursing Home Residents With Diabetes in Ontario, Canada.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Parent and Clinician Perspectives on Diagnostic Testing for Children With Diarrhea: A Qualitative Study.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Demonstrating the use of population level data to investigate trends in the rate, radiation dose and cost of Computed Tomography across clinical groups: Are there any areas of concern?Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Observational
- Breaking the chains in plato's cave: acute care in general practice.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Among Postpartum and Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-sectional Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Trends in syncope testing and admissions in the USA from 2006 through 2019.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025Article
- Demonstrating Feasibility of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS)-Guided Inpatient Transthoracic Echo Triage Decision Pathway.POCUS journal · 2025Article
- Not intervening as a form of care: Negotiating medical practices at the end-of-life.Medical anthropology quarterly · 2025Article
- GPs' perspectives on diagnostic testing in children with persistent non-specific symptoms: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Physician perspectives regarding over-screening for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers in older adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- South Korea's healthcare expenditure: a comprehensive study of public and private spending across health conditions, demographics, and payer types (2011-2020).The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- General practitioners' experiences with chronic abdominal symptoms and a faecal calprotectin guided referral strategy in children: A Dutch qualitative study.The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
- Gatekeeping and referral of patients holding private health insurance: a survey among general practitioners in Norway.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- Uncertainties of healthcare professionals and informal caregivers in rare diseases: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical tests provide important information to guide clinical management. Overtesting, however, may cause harm to patients and the healthcare system, including through misdiagnosis, false positives, false negatives and overdiagnosis. Clinicians are ultimately responsible for test requests, and are therefore ideally positioned to prevent overtesting and its unintended consequences. Through this narrative literature review and workshop discussion with experts at the Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference (Sydney, 2019), we aimed to identify and establish a thematic framework of factors that influence clinicians to request non-recommended and unnecessary tests.
methodsArticles exploring factors affecting clinician test ordering behaviour were identified through a systematic search of MedLine in April 2019, forward and backward citation searches and content experts. Two authors screened abstract titles and abstracts, and two authors screened full text for inclusion. Identified factors were categorised into a preliminary framework which was subsequently presented at the PODC for iterative development.
resultsThe MedLine search yielded 542 articles; 55 were included. Another 10 articles identified by forward-backward citation and content experts were included, resulting in 65 articles in total. Following small group discussion with workshop participants, a revised thematic framework of factors was developed: "Intrapersonal" - fear of malpractice and litigation; clinician knowledge and understanding; intolerance of uncertainty and risk aversion; cognitive biases and experiences; sense of medical obligation "Interpersonal" - pressure from patients and doctor-patient relationship; pressure from colleagues and medical culture; "Environment/context" - guidelines, protocols and policies; financial incentives and ownership of tests; time constraints, physical vulnerabilities and language barriers; availability and ease of access to tests; pre-emptive testing to facilitate subsequent care; contemporary medical practice and new technology
conclusionThis thematic framework may raise awareness of overtesting and prompt clinicians to change their test request behaviour. The development of a scale to assess clinician knowledge, attitudes and practices is planned to allow evaluation of clinician-targeted interventions to reduce overtesting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.