Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155384›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2021

Behavioral effects of four novel synthetic cathinone analogs in rodents.

Michael B Gatch, Ritu A Shetty, Nathalie Sumien, Michael J Forster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthetic Cathinones and Neurotoxicity Risks: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structure-Activity Relationship ofACS chemical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael B GatchPharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3474-211X
Ritu A ShettyPharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Nathalie SumienPharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Michael J ForsterPharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
University of North Texas · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271200700014CNIDA NIH HHS N01DA-18-8936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new generation of novel cathinone compounds has been developed as stimulant substitutes to avoid drug control laws and detection of use by blood tests. Dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, 4-chloroethcathinone (4-CEC), and 4'-methyl-α-pyrrolidinohexiophenone (MPHP) were tested for in vivo psychostimulant-like effects to assess their abuse liability. Locomotor activity was assessed in an open-field assay using Swiss-Webster mice to screen for locomotor stimulant effects and to identify behaviorally-active dose ranges, times of peak effect, and durations of action. Discriminative stimulus effects were assessed in separate groups of Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate cocaine or methamphetamine from vehicle. Dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, 4-CEC, and MPHP dose-dependently increased locomotor activity. Dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, and MPHP produced maximal stimulant effects similar to cocaine and methamphetamine. 4-CEC was less efficacious, producing peak stimulant effects of about 74% of that of methamphetamine. The compounds were less potent than methamphetamine and approximately equipotent with cocaine. The doses of cocaine, methamphetamine, dipentylone, and 4-CEC that produced peak effects lasted 2 to 3 h, the peak dose of N-ethylhexedrone lasted 4 h, and the peak dose of MPHP lasted 6 h. All four compounds fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine, although full substitution by 4-CEC occurred at doses that substantially decreased response rate. Only 4-CEC fully substituted for MDMA. These data provide evidence that the novel cathinone compounds dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, 4-CEC, and MPHP demonstrate potential for abuse as psychostimulants, given their ability to stimulate locomotor activity and their substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsAnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDiscrimination LearningDose-Response Relationship, DrugLocomotionMaleMethamphetamineMiceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySynthetic DrugsAlkaloidscathinoneCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineMethamphetamineSynthetic Drugsabuse liabilitycathinonesdrug discriminationlocomotor activitypsychostimulants

Identifiers

PMID33155384
PMCPMC11590110
OpenAlexW3095341446

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.