ArticleExperimental eye research2020
Quantification of ocular surface microcirculation by computer assisted video microscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05608798 (Microscopic and Spectroscopic Examination of Skin Microcirculation in Healthy Individuals Using ODI Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Microscopic and Spectroscopic Examination of Skin Microcirculation in Healthy Individuals Using ODI Technology
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interdisciplinary perspectives on diabetes and microcirculatory dysfunction: A global bibliometric analysis.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Deep learning and computer vision techniques for microcirculation analysis: A review.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In piglets we tested the applicability of digital video microscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for non-invasive assessments of limbal and bulbar conjunctival microcirculation. A priori we postulated that the metabolic rate is higher in limbal as compared to bulbar conjunctiva, and that this difference is reflected in microvascular structure or function between the two locations. Two study sites, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Norway and Cleveland Clinic (CC), USA, used the same video microscopy and spectroscopy techniques to record limbal and bulbar microcirculation in sleeping piglets. Recordings were analyzed with custom-made software to quantify functional capillary density, capillary flow velocity and microvascular oxygen saturation in measuring volumes of approximately 0.1 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.