Evidence mapPaperPMID 33158269Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Early Screening for Gestational Diabetes Using IADPSG Criteria May Be a Useful Predictor for Congenital Anomalies: Preliminary Data from a High-Risk Population.

Agnieszka Zawiejska, Katarzyna Wróblewska-Seniuk, Paweł Gutaj, Urszula Mantaj, Anna Gomulska, Joanna Kippen, Ewa Wender-Ozegowska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent Advances in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnieszka ZawiejskaDepartment of Reproduction, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-6550
Katarzyna Wróblewska-SeniukDepartment of Newborns' Infectious Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3908-6617
Paweł GutajDepartment of Reproduction, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, Poland.
Urszula MantajDepartment of Reproduction, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, Poland.
Anna GomulskaStudent Scientific Society-Student Research Group, Department of Reproduction, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3602-9230
Joanna KippenStudent Scientific Society-Student Research Group, Department of Reproduction, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, Poland.
Ewa Wender-OzegowskaDepartment of Reproduction, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim was to investigate whether the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) glycemic thresholds used for detecting hyperglycemia in pregnancy can be predictive for malformations in women with hyperglycemia detected in early pregnancy.

methodsa single-center, retrospective observational trial of 125 mother-infant pairs from singleton pregnancies with hyperglycemia according to the IADPSG criteria diagnosed at the gestational age below 16 weeks. Glucose values obtained from 75-g OGTT (oral glucose tolerance test) were investigated as predictors for congenital malformations in newborns.

resultsCharacteristics of the cohort: maternal age: 31.5 ± 5.2, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m

conclusions(1) Fasting glycemia diagnostic for GDM measured in early pregnancy is associated with a significantly elevated risk for congenital malformations. (2) Our data suggest that women at elevated risks of GDM/diabetes in pregnancy (DiP) should have their fasting blood glucose assessed before becoming pregnant, and the optimization of glycemic control should be considered if the FBG exceeds 5.1 mmol/dL.

Indexed as

early gestational diabetesfetal malformationshyperglycemia in pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33158269
PMCPMC7694288
OpenAlexW3097594688

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.