Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170888›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Adverse birth outcome and associated factors among diabetic pregnant women in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Demeke Mesfin Belay, Wubet Alebachew Bayih, Abebaw Yeshambel Alemu, Aklilu Endalamaw Sinshaw, Demewoz Kefale Mekonen, Amare Simegn Ayele, Wasihun Hailemichael Belayneh, Henoke Andualem Tegared, Biniam Minuye Birihane

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Demeke Mesfin BelayDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-4786-2866
Wubet Alebachew BayihDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1439-4402
Abebaw Yeshambel AlemuDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Aklilu Endalamaw SinshawDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Demewoz Kefale MekonenDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Amare Simegn AyeleDepartment of Midwifery, Reproductive health, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Wasihun Hailemichael BelaynehDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Immunology, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Henoke Andualem TegaredDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Immunology, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Biniam Minuye BirihaneDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe magnitude of adverse birth outcome among diabetic pregnant women is high in low-and-middle income countries, like Ethiopia. Precise epidemiological evidence is necessary to plan, evaluate and improve effective preventive measures. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to estimate the pooled prevalence of adverse birth outcome and associated factors among diabetic pregnant women in Ethiopia.

methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, Web of Science and PsycINFO, and article found in University online repository were accessed. Observational studies such as cross-sectional, case-control and prospective cohort reported using English language was involved. I2 statistic was used to check heterogeneity. Egger's test and funnel plot were used to measure publication bias. Weighted inverse variance random effects model was also performed.

resultsSeven studies with 1,225 study participants were retrieved to estimate the pooled prevalence of adverse birth outcome and associated factors. The pooled prevalence of adverse birth outcome among diabetic pregnant women was 5.3% [95% CI; 1.61, 17.41]. Fasting blood glucose level above 100 mg/dl [Adjusted Odds ratio (AOR) = 10.51; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 5.90, 15.12], two hour post prandial glucose level above 120 mg/dl [AOR = 8.77; 95% CI = 4.51, 13.03], gestational age <37 completed week [AOR = 9.76; 95% CI = 5.29, 14.23], no ANC follow-up [AOR = 10.78; 95% CI = 6.12, 15.44], history of previous adverse outcomes [AOR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.04, 5.90], maternal age < 30 years [AOR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.04, 5.90], and illiteracy [AOR = 2.89; 95% CI = 0.81,4.97)] were associated factors of adverse birth outcome.

conclusionsThe pooled prevalence of adverse birth outcomes among diabetic pregnant women in Ethiopia was high. Child born from mothers who were illiterate, maternal age < 30 years, gestational age < 37 completed weeks, history of previous adverse birth outcomes and no ANC follow-up increased the risk of adverse birth outcome.

trial registrationIt is registered in PROSPERO data base: (PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020167734).

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusEthiopiaFemaleGestational AgeHumansOdds RatioPregnancyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33170888
PMCPMC7654793

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.