ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021
Continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill children: single-center experience
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications and outcomes of children under one year treated with continuous kidney replacement therapy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Observational
- Prognostic Features for Overall Survival in Male Diabetic Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Using Elastic Net Penalized Cox Regression; A Machine Learning Approach.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and feasibility of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in neonates weighing 3 kg or less: a two-centre, retrospective study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- Worldwide Exploration of Renal Replacement Outcomes Collaborative in Kidney Disease (WE-ROCK).Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Slow Low-Efficiency Dialysis in Children.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Optimal stage of initiating continuous renal replacement therapy in the treatment of neonatal acute kidney injury.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has significant benefits in the treatment of critically ill children. The objective of this study is to describe the treatment indications, methods, demographics, and outcome of the patients who received CRRT in our pediatric intensive care unit and neonatal care unit, and, according to these results, we also aim to make improvements in our unit-based interventions. Material and methods: In this single-centered study, we retrospectively evaluated medical charts of the patients admitted to our intensive care units and received CRRT between February 2010 and November 2015. Results: Fifty of 60 patients were included in this study. Newborns made up 28% (n = 14) of the patients. The mean body weight was 18.4 kg (2.3-98 kg). CRRT indications were fluid overload (30%), acute kidney injury (40%), metabolic disease (24%), electrolyte impairment (4%), and drug intoxication (2%). The most common method of CRRT was continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) (72%). The mean duration of CRRT was 135 hours (1-864) and totally 143 filters, polyarylethersulfon (n = 23.46%) and polyacrylonitrile (n = 27.54%) were used. Overall survival was 42%. The survival rate of newborns was significantly higher (P = 0.046). Conclusion: CRRT is a lifesaving method that can be applied to critically ill children with acute kidney injury and fluid overload at any age and weight by experienced teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.