ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2020
gene.iobio: an interactive web tool for versatile, clinically-driven variant interrogation and prioritization.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging concepts in the science of vaccine adjuvants.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021Review
- The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients on haemodialysis.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With increasing utilization of comprehensive genomic data to guide clinical care, anticipated to become the standard of care in many clinical settings, the practice of diagnostic medicine is undergoing a notable shift. However, the move from single-gene or panel-based genetic testing to exome and genome sequencing has not been matched by the development of tools to enable diagnosticians to interpret increasingly complex genomic findings. A new paradigm has emerged, where genome-based tests are often evaluated by a large multi-disciplinary collaborative team, typically including a diagnostic pathologist, a bioinformatician, a genetic counselor, and often a subspeciality clinician. This team-based approach calls for new computational tools to allow every member of the clinical care provider team, at varying levels of genetic knowledge and diagnostic expertise, to quickly and easily analyze and interpret complex genomic data. Here, we present
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.