Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176732›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Quality and women's satisfaction with maternal referral practices in sub-Saharan African low and lower-middle income countries: a systematic review.

Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Carolyne Njue, Nguyen Toan Tran, Angela Dawson

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Multistakeholder perspectives on geographical accessibility to emergency obstetric care in Benin City, Nigeria.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Referral Audit of Critically Ill Obstetric Patients: A Five-year Review from a Tertiary Care Health Facility in India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward Kwabena AmeyawThe Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia. edward.k.ameyaw@student.uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6617-237X
Carolyne NjueThe Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9325-3565
Nguyen Toan TranThe Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-7878
Angela DawsonThe Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0926-2202
University of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsub-Saharan African Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries (sSA LLMICs) have the highest burden of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in the world. Timely and appropriate maternal referral to a suitable health facility is an indicator of effective health systems. In this systematic review we aimed to identify which referral practices are delivered according to accepted standards for pregnant women and newborns in sSA LLMICs by competent healthcare providers in line with the needs of pregnant women.

methodsSix electronic databases were systematically searched for primary data studies (2009-2018) in English reporting on maternal referral practices and their effectiveness. We conducted a content analysis guided by a framework for assessing the quality of maternal referral. Quality referral was defined as: timely identification of signal functions, established guidelines or standards, adequate documentation, staff accompaniment and prompt care by competent healthcare providers in the receiving facility.

resultsSeventeen articles were included in the study. Most studies were quantitative (n = 11). Two studies reported that women were dissatisfied due to delays in referral processes that affected their health. Most articles (10) reported that women were not accompanied to higher levels of care, delays in referral processes, transport challenges and poor referral documentation. Some healthcare providers administered essential drugs such as misoprostol prior to referral.

conclusionsEfforts to improve maternal health in LLMICs should aim to enhance maternity care providers' ability to identify conditions that demand referral. Low cost transport is needed to mitigate barriers of referral. To ensure quality maternal referral, district level health managers should be trained and equipped with the skills needed to monitor and evaluate referral documentation, including quality and efficiency of maternal referrals.

trial registrationSystematic review registration: PROSPERO registration CRD42018114261 .

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPersonal SatisfactionAfrica South of the SaharaDeveloping CountriesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyReferral and ConsultationMaternal referral practicesQuality maternal referralReferral guidelinesReferral standardsSignal functionsSub-Saharan Africawomen’s satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33176732
PMCPMC7656726
OpenAlexW3099573041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.