ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2020
RNA-Seq-Based Breast Cancer Subtypes Classification Using Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying breast cancer subtypes on multi-omics data via sparse canonical correlation analysis and deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Classification of Long Non-Coding RNAs s Between Early and Late Stage of Liver Cancers From Non-coding RNA Profiles Using Machine-Learning Approach.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Article
- Molecular Characterization and Landscape of Breast cancer Models from a multi-omics Perspective.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2023Review
- moBRCA-net: a breast cancer subtype classification framework based on multi-omics attention neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Value of genomics- and radiomics-based machine learning models in the identification of breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- PSOWNNs-CNN: A Computational Radiology for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Improvement Based on Image Processing Using Machine Learning Methods.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Bulk and Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data to Foster Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Oncogenic and Tumor Suppressive Components of the Cell Cycle in Breast Cancer Progression and Prognosis.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) is not a single disease as each subtype has a distinct morphology structure. Although several computational methods have been proposed to conduct breast cancer subtype identification, the specific interaction mechanisms of genes involved in the subtypes are still incomplete. To identify and explore the corresponding interaction mechanisms of genes for each subtype of breast cancer can impose an important impact on the personalized treatment for different patients.
methodsWe integrate the biological importance of genes from the gene regulatory networks to the differential expression analysis and then obtain the weighted differentially expressed genes (weighted DEGs). A gene with a high weight means it regulates more target genes and thus holds more biological importance. Besides, we constructed gene coexpression networks for control and experiment groups, and the significantly differentially interacting structures encouraged us to design the corresponding Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment based on gene coexpression networks (GOEGCN). The GOEGCN considers the two-side distinction analysis between gene coexpression networks for control and experiment groups. The method allows us to study how the modulated coexpressed gene couples impact biological functions at a GO level.
resultsWe modeled the binary classification with weighted DEGs for each subtype. The binary classifier could make a good prediction for an unseen sample, and the experimental results validated the effectiveness of our proposed approaches. The novel enriched GO terms based on GOEGCN for control and experiment groups of each subtype explain the specific biological function changes according to the two-side distinction of coexpression network structures to some extent.
conclusionThe weighted DEGs contain biological importance derived from the gene regulatory network. Based on the weighted DEGs, five binary classifiers were learned and showed good performance concerning the "Sensitivity," "Specificity," "Accuracy," "
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.