Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33180559›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

Comparison of time-of-flight MR angiography and intracranial vessel wall MRI for luminal measurements relative to CT angiography.

Basar Sarikaya, Charles Colip, William D Hwang, Daniel S Hippe, Chengcheng Zhu, Jie Sun, Niranjan Balu, Chun Yuan, Mahmud Mossa-Basha

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Vessel Wall Imaging in Cryptogenic Stroke.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advanced cross-sectional imaging of cerebral aneurysms.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vessel Wall MR Imaging in the Pediatric Head and Neck.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Basar SarikayaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
Charles ColipDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
William D HwangDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
Daniel S HippeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
Chengcheng ZhuDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
Jie SunDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
Niranjan BaluDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
Chun YuanDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.
Mahmud Mossa-BashaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, SA, USA.

Funding

3D WALLI: MR intracranial vessel wall imaging for stroke preventionR01NS092207 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOSSA-BASHA, MAHMUD, YUAN, CHUN · 2016 to 2019
$3.1M
Characterization of intracranial vessel wall morphology and inflammation using 3D high resolution MRIR00HL136883 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZHU, CHENGCHENG · 2020 to 2022
$747k
3D WALLI: MR intracranial vessel wall imaging for stroke preventionR56NS092207 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOSSA-BASHA, MAHMUD, YUAN, CHUN · 2015 to 2015
$609k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL136883NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092207NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS092207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether intracranial vessel wall (IVW) MRI luminal measurements are more accurate than non-contrast 3D-TOF-MRA measurements for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, relative to CTA.

methodsConsecutive patients with non-calcified intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis seen on CTA, who had non-contrast 3D-TOF-MRA and IVW performed between 1 January 2013 and 20 April 2014 were selected, and images with stenosis were pre-selected by a single independent rater. The pre-selected CTA, MRA, and IVW (

results18 patients with 33 intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses were included. Relative to CTA, IVW had 40% less variance than MRA (

conclusionIVW provides more accurate stenosis measurements than MRA when compared to CTA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Considering higher stenosis measurement accuracy of IVW, it can be more reliably used for quantitative evaluation relative to MRA.

Indexed as

AdultArteriesBody Weights and MeasuresBrainCerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial ArteriosclerosisMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID33180559
PMCPMC7934297

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.