Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33181506›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

Data-driven dose calculation algorithm based on deep U-Net.

Jiawei Fan, Lei Xing, Peng Dong, Jiazhou Wang, Weigang Hu, Yong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiawei FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, United States of America.
Lei XingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, United States of America.
Peng DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, United States of America.
Jiazhou WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9012-6605
Weigang HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China.
Yong YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, United States of America.

Funding

Dual Modality X-ray Luminescence CT for in vivo Cancer ImagingR01CA227713 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI XING, LEI · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Radioluminescence dosimetry solution for precision radiation therapyR01CA223667 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI XING, LEI · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA223667NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and efficient dose calculation is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of radiation therapy. However, all the dose calculation algorithms commonly used in current clinical practice have to compromise between calculation accuracy and efficiency, which may result in unsatisfactory dose accuracy or highly intensive computation time in many clinical situations. The purpose of this work is to develop a novel dose calculation algorithm based on the deep learning method for radiation therapy. In this study we performed a feasibility investigation on implementing a fast and accurate dose calculation based on a deep learning technique. A two-dimensional (2D) fluence map was first converted into a three-dimensional (3D) volume using ray traversal algorithm. 3D U-Net like deep residual network was then established to learn a mapping between this converted 3D volume, CT and 3D dose distribution. Therefore an indirect relationship was built between a fluence map and its corresponding 3D dose distribution without using significantly complex neural networks. Two hundred patients, including nasopharyngeal, lung, rectum and breast cancer cases, were collected and applied to train the proposed network. Additional 47 patients were randomly selected to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method through comparing dose distributions, dose volume histograms and clinical indices with the results from a treatment planning system (TPS), which was used as the ground truth in this study. The proposed deep learning based dose calculation algorithm achieved good predictive performance. For 47 tested patients, the average per-voxel bias of the deep learning calculated value and standard deviation (normalized to the prescription), relative to the TPS calculation, is 0.17%±2.28%. The average deep learning calculated values and standard deviations for relevant clinical indices were compared with the TPS calculated results and the t-test p-values demonstrated the consistency between them. In this study we developed a new deep learning based dose calculation method. This approach was evaluated by the clinical cases with different sites. Our results demonstrated its feasibility and reliability and indicated its great potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of radiation dose calculation for different treatment modalities.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiation DosageHumansNeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33181506
PMCPMC7870566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.