ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
Data-driven dose calculation algorithm based on deep U-Net.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving deep-learning IMRT plan quality for lymphoma using deliverability-aware training.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Fast 3D whole-body occupational dose estimation in interventional radiology using physics-informed deep learning.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Review
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Geometry-encoded deep learning (GeoDL) framework for real-time 3D dose verification for online adaptive radiotherapy.Machine learning. Health · 2025Article
- Prediction of three-dimensional dose distribution for patient-specific quality assurance based on log files using WingsNet.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based synthetic-CT-free photon dose calculation in MR-guided radiotherapy: A proof-of-concept study.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy: a secondary dose verification model with geometry-encoded U-Net.Machine learning: science and technology · 2024Article
- A deep learning-based dose calculation method for volumetric modulated arc therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Application and progress of artificial intelligence in radiation therapy dose prediction.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Review
- A generalization performance study on the boosting radiotherapy dose calculation engine based on super-resolution.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- An overview of artificial intelligence in medical physics and radiation oncology.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2023Review
- Sub-second photon dose prediction via transformer neural networks.Medical physics · 2023Article
- A deep-learning-based dose verification tool utilizing fluence maps for a cobalt-60 compensator-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy system.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Prediction of dose deposition matrix using voxel features driven machine learning approach.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Dose prediction for cervical cancer VMAT patients with a full-scale 3D-cGAN-based model and the comparison of different input data on the prediction results.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Multimodal image translation via deep learning inference model trained in video domain.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- A feasibility study for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT using Monte Carlo dose calculation and deep learning-based modelling of EPID detector response.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence based treatment planning of radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and efficient dose calculation is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of radiation therapy. However, all the dose calculation algorithms commonly used in current clinical practice have to compromise between calculation accuracy and efficiency, which may result in unsatisfactory dose accuracy or highly intensive computation time in many clinical situations. The purpose of this work is to develop a novel dose calculation algorithm based on the deep learning method for radiation therapy. In this study we performed a feasibility investigation on implementing a fast and accurate dose calculation based on a deep learning technique. A two-dimensional (2D) fluence map was first converted into a three-dimensional (3D) volume using ray traversal algorithm. 3D U-Net like deep residual network was then established to learn a mapping between this converted 3D volume, CT and 3D dose distribution. Therefore an indirect relationship was built between a fluence map and its corresponding 3D dose distribution without using significantly complex neural networks. Two hundred patients, including nasopharyngeal, lung, rectum and breast cancer cases, were collected and applied to train the proposed network. Additional 47 patients were randomly selected to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method through comparing dose distributions, dose volume histograms and clinical indices with the results from a treatment planning system (TPS), which was used as the ground truth in this study. The proposed deep learning based dose calculation algorithm achieved good predictive performance. For 47 tested patients, the average per-voxel bias of the deep learning calculated value and standard deviation (normalized to the prescription), relative to the TPS calculation, is 0.17%±2.28%. The average deep learning calculated values and standard deviations for relevant clinical indices were compared with the TPS calculated results and the t-test p-values demonstrated the consistency between them. In this study we developed a new deep learning based dose calculation method. This approach was evaluated by the clinical cases with different sites. Our results demonstrated its feasibility and reliability and indicated its great potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of radiation dose calculation for different treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.