ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2021
Coronary remodeling and biomechanics: Are we going with the flow in 2020?
Review in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single cell and spatial transcriptomic profiling of the type 2 diabetic coronary microcirculation and myocardium.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Article
- Coronary cytoskeletal modulation of coronary blood flow in the presence and absence of type 2 diabetes: the role of cofilin.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Expanding landscape of coronary microvascular disease in co-morbid conditions: Metabolic disease and beyond.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024Review
- Role of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Cardiovascular Protection in CKD Patients: Reappraisal of Their Impact and Mechanisms.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Review
- Improvement of automated analysis of coronary Doppler echocardiograms.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current review and future research directions.Cardiovascular research · 2021Review
- Guidelines for the measurement of vascular function and structure in isolated arteries and veins.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Under normal conditions, coronary blood flow (CBF) provides critical blood supply to the myocardium so that it can appropriately meet the metabolic demands of the body. Dogmatically, there exist several known regulators and modulators of CBF that include local metabolites and neurohormonal factors that can influence the function of the coronary circulation. In disease states such as diabetes and myocardial ischemia, these regulators are impaired or shifted such that CBF is reduced. Although functional considerations have been and continued to be well studied, more recent evidence builds upon established studies that collectively suggest that the relative roles of coronary structure, biomechanics, and the influence of cardiac biomechanics via extravascular compression may also play a significant role in dictating CBF. In this mini review, we discuss these regulators of CBF under normal and pathophysiological conditions and their potential influence on the control of CBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.