ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2021
Can Baseline Characteristics be Used to Predict Liver Disease Outcomes in Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease?
Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Course and Predictors of Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Obese Children and Adolescents.Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the feasibility of screening for paediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLongitudinal studies on childhood predictors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) progression are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine whether baseline clinical or laboratory measures predict liver disease outcomes in a pediatric NAFLD cohort.
methodsA retrospective study of patients with presumed NAFLD was conducted using baseline and follow-up clinical and laboratory measures. Disease outcomes were defined using the mean serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels from 24 to 36 months after the first visit. Logistic regression assessed the relationship between ALT progression/regression and predictor variables. Multivariable regression determined the best model for predicting the ALT outcome. Markov process modeling explored the likelihood for a patient to transition between ALT states.
resultsOf a total of 816 patients identified, 144 had sufficient data. Regression was seen in 26%, whereas 30% progressed. No baseline clinical or laboratory measurements had a significant effect on disease outcomes. Markov modeling demonstrated that subjects were more likely to either remain in their baseline ALT group or worsen rather than improve.
conclusionsRoutinely obtained baseline clinical or laboratory measures cannot help risk-stratify youth with presumed NAFLD in terms of long-term outcomes. Close clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of patients is warranted to determine those at risk of progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.