ReviewAnesthesia and analgesia2020
Perioperative Lung Protection: Clinical Implications.
Review in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Evaluation of mechanical ventilation modes in the laparoscopic perioperative period with electrical impedance tomography.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Comparison of lung aeration loss in open abdominal oncologic surgeries after ventilation with electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP versus conventional PEEP: a pilot feasibility study.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Intraoperative protective ventilation in patients undergoing major neurosurgical interventions: a randomized clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Trial
- Emerging trends and hotspots in lung-protective ventilation from 2006 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Effect of 10 cm H₂O positive end-expiratory pressure on right internal jugular vein cross-sectional area in obese patients under general anesthesia: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- Mechanical power during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Observational
- Apneustic anesthesia ventilation improves pulmonary function in anesthetized bottlenose dolphins (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Preoperative preparation and postoperative care in children in thoracic surgery.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2024Review
- [Perioperative hyperoxia-More harmful than beneficial?]Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Review
- Different positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume controls on lung protection and inflammatory factors during surgical anesthesia.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- A structured narrative review of clinical and experimental studies of the use of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels during thoracic surgery.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Review
- Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2022Article
- Respiratory Mechanics.Anesthesiology clinics · 2021Review
- Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients.Critical care research and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past, it was common practice to use a high tidal volume (VT) during intraoperative ventilation, because this reduced the need for high oxygen fractions to compensate for the ventilation-perfusion mismatches due to atelectasis in a time when it was uncommon to use positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in the operating room. Convincing and increasing evidence for harm induced by ventilation with a high VT has emerged over recent decades, also in the operating room, and by now intraoperative ventilation with a low VT is a well-adopted approach. There is less certainty about the level of PEEP during intraoperative ventilation. Evidence for benefit and harm of higher PEEP during intraoperative ventilation is at least contradicting. While some PEEP may prevent lung injury through reduction of atelectasis, higher PEEP is undeniably associated with an increased risk of intraoperative hypotension that frequently requires administration of vasoactive drugs. The optimal level of inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2) during surgery is even more uncertain. The suggestion that hyperoxemia prevents against surgical site infections has not been confirmed in recent research. In addition, gas absorption-induced atelectasis and its association with adverse outcomes like postoperative pulmonary complications actually makes use of a high FIO2 less attractive. Based on the available evidence, we recommend the use of a low VT of 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight in all surgery patients, and to restrict use of a high PEEP and high FIO2 during intraoperative ventilation to cases in which hypoxemia develops. Here, we prefer to first increase FIO2 before using high PEEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.