Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33186714›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Independent components of human brain morphology.

Yujiang Wang, Karoline Leiberg, Tobias Ludwig, Bethany Little, Joe H Necus, Gavin Winston, Sjoerd B Vos, Jane de Tisi, John S Duncan, Peter N Taylor and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Generating Novel Brain Morphology by Deforming Learned Templates.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Born too young or too blue tips the scaling of a folded brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Cortical scaling of the neonatal brain in typical and altered development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Attention-Enhanced Fusion of Structural and Functional MRI for Analyzing HIV-Associated Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yujiang WangCNNP Lab (www.cnnp-lab.com), Interdisciplinary Complex Systems Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. Electronic address: yujiang.wang@ncl.ac.uk.
Karoline LeibergCNNP Lab (www.cnnp-lab.com), Interdisciplinary Complex Systems Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Tobias LudwigGraduate Training Center of Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bethany LittleCNNP Lab (www.cnnp-lab.com), Interdisciplinary Complex Systems Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Joe H NecusCNNP Lab (www.cnnp-lab.com), Interdisciplinary Complex Systems Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gavin WinstonUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK.
Sjoerd B VosUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK; Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK.
Jane de TisiUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
John S DuncanUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK.
Peter N TaylorCNNP Lab (www.cnnp-lab.com), Interdisciplinary Complex Systems Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Bruno MotaInstitute of Physics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008217/1Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0802012Medical Research Council MR/M00841X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208940/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 210109/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of brain morphology has become an important cornerstone in understanding brain structure. Measures of cortical morphology such as thickness and surface area are frequently used to compare groups of subjects or characterise longitudinal changes. However, such measures are often treated as independent from each other. A recently described scaling law, derived from a statistical physics model of cortical folding, demonstrates that there is a tight covariance between three commonly used cortical morphology measures: cortical thickness, total surface area, and exposed surface area. We show that assuming the independence of cortical morphology measures can hide features and potentially lead to misinterpretations. Using the scaling law, we account for the covariance between cortical morphology measures and derive novel independent measures of cortical morphology. By applying these new measures, we show that new information can be gained; in our example we show that distinct morphological alterations underlie healthy ageing compared to temporal lobe epilepsy, even on the coarse level of a whole hemisphere. We thus provide a conceptual framework for characterising cortical morphology in a statistically valid and interpretable manner, based on theoretical reasoning about the shape of the cortex.

Indexed as

Brain Cortical ThicknessModels, NeurologicalAdultBrainFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33186714
PMCPMC7836233

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.