Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33188745›Full record

Trial reportCurrent biology : CB2021

The Computational, Pharmacological, and Physiological Determinants of Sensory Learning under Uncertainty.

Rebecca P Lawson, James Bisby, Camilla L Nord, Neil Burgess, Geraint Rees

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Disentangling the roles of dopamine and noradrenaline in the exploration-exploitation tradeoff during human decision-making.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Orbitofrontal noradrenaline supports adaptive learning-rate adjustment in probabilistic reversal learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Active information sampling in health and disease.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bayesian Workflow for Generative Modeling in Computational Psychiatry.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Computational Mechanisms of Information-Seeking in Anxiety.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  17. The Many Roles of Precision in Action.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca P LawsonDepartment of Psychology, Downing Street, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK; MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Chaucer Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK. Electronic address: rl337@cam.ac.uk.
James BisbyInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Queen Square, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; Division of Psychiatry, Tottenham Court Road, University College London, London W1T 7NF, UK.
Camilla L NordMRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Chaucer Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
Neil BurgessInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Queen Square, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Geraint ReesInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Queen Square, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105579215Wellcome Trust 206691/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to represent and respond to uncertainty is fundamental to human cognition and decision-making. Noradrenaline (NA) is hypothesized to play a key role in coordinating the sensory, learning, and physiological states necessary to adapt to a changing world, but direct evidence for this is lacking in humans. Here, we tested the effects of attenuating noradrenergic neurotransmission on learning under uncertainty. We probed the effects of the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol (40 mg) using a between-subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Participants performed a probabilistic associative learning task, and we employed a hierarchical learning model to formally quantify prediction errors about cue-outcome contingencies and changes in these associations over time (volatility). Both unexpectedness and noise slowed down reaction times, but propranolol augmented the interaction between these main effects such that behavior was influenced more by prior expectations when uncertainty was high. Computationally, this was driven by a reduction in learning rates, with people slower to update their beliefs in the face of new information. Attenuating the global effects of NA also eliminated the phasic effects of prediction error and volatility on pupil size, consistent with slower belief updating. Finally, estimates of environmental volatility were predicted by baseline cardiac measures in all participants. Our results demonstrate that NA underpins behavioral and computational responses to uncertainty. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of uncertainty on human biology and cognition.

Indexed as

UncertaintyAdolescentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultBayes TheoremCognitionComputer SimulationDecision MakingDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansLearningMaleModels, PsychologicalModels, StatisticalAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsNorepinephrinePropranololanxietyBayesianblood pressurecardiaccomputational modelinglearningnoradrenalineperceptionpupillometryuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID33188745
PMCPMC7808754
OpenAlexW3103351842

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.