ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2020
Design and Preparation of Molecularly Imprinted Membranes for Selective Separation of Acteoside.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Note about Crosslinking Density in Imprinting Polymerization.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acteoside (ACT) belongs to a type of phenylethanoid glycosides (PhGs), and it is worthy of obtaining high-purity due to its significant medicinal functions. In this study, a novel class of MIMs was designed and synthesized with PVDF membranes as the base membrane for high selective separation and enrichment of ACT. The effects of the different functional monomers, the amounts of functional monomers, crosslinking agents, and initiators on the separation properties of MIMs were investigated. Furthermore, adsorption ability, permeation capacity, and reusability of MIMs were discussed for ACT. It indicated that MIM7 was the optimal performance of MIMs. The adsorption ability of MIM7 for ACT was 62.83 mg/g, and the selectivity factor (α) of MIM7 was up to 2.74 and its permeability factor (β) was greater than 2.66. Moreover, the adsorption amount of MIM7 was still more than 88.57% of the initial value after five cycles. As an ACT imprinted layer of MIMs only had recognition sites for ACT molecules, which recombined with the recognition sites in the membrane permeation experiment, ACT molecules penetration was hindered. However, the analogs of ECH successfully passed MIMs. It indicated that the selective MIMs for ACT followed the mechanism of delayed permeation. This work provides an important reference for the high permselective separation of natural products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.