Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211552›Full record

ArticleBig data2021

Bridging the Brain and Data Sciences.

John Darrell Van Horn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Big data, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John Darrell Van HornDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

Promoting Institutional Communities for Open Data ScienceU24ES026465 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VAN HORN, JOHN DARRELL · 2015 to 2017
$7.6M
Data Archive for the Brain Initiative (DABI)R24MH114796 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DUNCAN, DOMINIQUE, POURATIAN, NADER · 2018 to 2023
$6.2M
Multimodality Image-Based Assessment System for Traumatic Brain InjuryR44NS081792 · NINDS · KITWARE, INC. · PI AYLWARD, STEPHEN R, NIETHAMMER, MARC · 2015 to 2016
$1.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES026465NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114796NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS081792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain scientists are now capable of collecting more data in a single experiment than researchers a generation ago might have collected over an entire career. Indeed, the brain itself seems to thirst for more and more data. Such digital information not only comprises individual studies but is also increasingly shared and made openly available for secondary, confirmatory, and/or combined analyses. Numerous web resources now exist containing data across spatiotemporal scales. Data processing workflow technologies running via cloud-enabled computing infrastructures allow for large-scale processing. Such a move toward greater openness is fundamentally changing how brain science results are communicated and linked to available raw data and processed results. Ethical, professional, and motivational issues challenge the whole-scale commitment to data-driven neuroscience. Nevertheless, fueled by government investments into primary brain data collection coupled with increased sharing and community pressure challenging the dominant publishing model, large-scale brain and data science is here to stay.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingData ScienceBrainPublishingdatabasesdata scienceeducationmachine learningneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33211552
PMCPMC8233216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.