Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33213447›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2020

Functional genomics of AP-2α and AP-2γ in cancers: in silico study.

Damian Kołat, Żaneta Kałuzińska, Magdalena Orzechowska, Andrzej K Bednarek, Elżbieta Płuciennik

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damian KołatDepartment of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Medical University of Lodz, 90-752, Lodz, Poland. damian.kolat@stud.umed.lodz.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-3796
Żaneta KałuzińskaDepartment of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Medical University of Lodz, 90-752, Lodz, Poland.
Magdalena OrzechowskaDepartment of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Medical University of Lodz, 90-752, Lodz, Poland.
Andrzej K BednarekDepartment of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Medical University of Lodz, 90-752, Lodz, Poland.
Elżbieta PłuciennikDepartment of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Medical University of Lodz, 90-752, Lodz, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503/0-078-02/503-01-001-19-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong all causes of death, cancer is the most prevalent and is only outpaced by cardiovascular diseases. Molecular theory of carcinogenesis states that apoptosis and proliferation are regulated by groups of tumor suppressors or oncogenes. Transcription factors are example of proteins comprising representatives of both cancer-related groups. Exemplary family of transcription factors which exhibits dualism of function is Activating enhancer-binding Protein 2 (AP-2). Scientific reports concerning their function in carcinogenesis depend on particular family member and/or tumor type which proves the issue to be unsolved. Therefore, the present study examines role of the best-described AP-2 representatives, AP-2α and AP-2γ, through ontological analysis of their target genes and investigation what processes are differentially regulated in 21 cancers using samples deposited in Genomic Data Analysis Center (GDAC) Firehose.

methodsExpression data with clinical annotation was collected from TCGA-dedicated repository GDAC Firehose. Transcription factor targets were obtained from Gene Transcription Regulation Database (GTRD), TRANScription FACtor database (TRANSFAC) and Transcriptional Regulatory Relationships Unraveled by Sentence-based Text mining (TRRUST). Monocle3 R package was used for global samples profiling while Protein ANalysis THrough Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER) tool was used to perform gene ontology analysis.

resultsWith RNA-seq data and Monocle3 or PANTHER tools we outlined differences in many processes and signaling pathways, separating tumor from normal tissues or tumors from each other. Unexpectedly, a number of alterations in basal-like breast cancer were identified that distinguished it from other subtypes, which could bring future clinical benefits.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that while the AP-2α/γ role remains ambiguous, their activity is based on processes that underlie the cancer hallmarks and their expression could have potential in diagnosis of selected tumors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene OntologyHumansMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsRNA-SeqSignal TransductionTranscription Factor AP-2Transcription, GeneticNeoplasm ProteinsTFAP2C protein, humanTranscription Factor AP-2AP-2αAP-2γBioinformaticsCancerTarget genesTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID33213447
PMCPMC7678100
OpenAlexW3104716630

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.