ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2020
Percutaneous repair of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture presenting with cardiogenic shock.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous Closure vs. Surgical Repair for Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Relationship between Complete Revascularization and Survival after Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2023Article
- Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute MI Management.US cardiology · 2023Review
- A new dimension to the STEMI-related mortality risk seen in the COVID-19 pandemic era.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is an uncommon and devastating complication with a high mortality rate due to limited available interventions required by expert hands in a small window of opportunity. Most commonly seen following delayed myocardial infarctions (MI), the rate of VSR has decreased partly from protocol driven reperfusion therapy; however, cases are still present, particularly when diagnosis is delayed. We present a case of a critically ill patient in cardiogenic shock following a large anterolateral wall ST-elevation MI complicated by a large VSR whom was transferred to our academic institution for percutaneous repair. Of note, such intervention was initially performed by Lock in 1988 and a comprehensive review published in 2016 noted only 273 such cases. This review noted patient cases since that initial percutaneous closure by Lock with a majority of cases utilizing an Amplatzer system; others being Clamshell and CardioSEAL. Our patient underwent the percutaneous VSR closure utilizing an Amplatzer Occluder delivery system with successful insertion of an 18 mm muscular VSD Amplatzer closure device. Although the rarely performed procedure was successful and provided invaluable insights into the treatment and management of VSR, the patient succumbed to multiple critical disease processes in the following days post intervention. Patient consent and ethics committee approval for publication, as per Saint Louis University case publication guidelines, were confirmed and approved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33224586PMC7675175W3109218536What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.