Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226547›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2020

An event based topic learning pipeline for neuroimaging literature mining.

Lihong Chen, Jianzhuo Yan, Jianhui Chen, Ying Sheng, Zhe Xu, Mufti Mahmud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep Learning in Mining Biological Data.Cognitive computation · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lihong ChenFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Jianzhuo YanFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Jianhui ChenBeijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China. chenjianhui@bjut.edu.cn.
Ying ShengFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Zhe XuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Mufti MahmudDepartment of Computing & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging text mining extracts knowledge from neuroimaging texts and has received widespread attention. Topic learning is an important research focus of neuroimaging text mining. However, current neuroimaging topic learning researches mainly used traditional probability topic models to extract topics from literature and cannot obtain high-quality neuroimaging topics. The existing topic learning methods also cannot meet the requirements of topic learning oriented to full-text neuroimaging literature. In this paper, three types of neuroimaging research topic events are defined to describe the process and result of neuroimaging researches. An event based topic learning pipeline, called neuroimaging Event-BTM, is proposed to realize topic learning from full-text neuroimaging literature. The experimental results on the PLoS One data set show that the accuracy and completeness of the proposed method are significantly better than the existing main topic learning methods.

Indexed as

Biterm topic modelEvent extractionNeuroimaging text miningTopic learning

Identifiers

PMID33226547
PMCPMC7683633

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.