ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
A dual-feedback loop model of the mammalian circadian clock for multi-input control of circadian phase.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological Rhythms and Biological Variation of Biomolecules: The Road to Personalized Laboratory Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Downregulation of RORα by alcohol promotes TGFβ and α-SMA expression in mouse lung fibroblasts.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Circadian clock model with sequestration repression motif: existence of periodic orbits and entrainment properties.Interface focus · 2025Article
- The Circadian Clock Component RORA Increases Immunosurveillance in Melanoma by Inhibiting PD-L1 Expression.Cancer research · 2024Article
- A minimal model of peripheral clocks reveals differential circadian re-entrainment in aging.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Input integration by the circadian clock exhibits nonadditivity and fold-change detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- The Role of Circadian Clock Genes in Critical Illness: The Potential Role of Translational Clock Gene Therapies for Targeting Inflammation, Mitochondrial Function, and Muscle Mass in Intensive Care.Journal of biological rhythms · 2022Review
- Data-driven modelling captures dynamics of the circadian clock of Neurospora crassa.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- The Relevance of Circadian Clocks to Stem Cell Differentiation and Cancer Progression.NeuroSci · 2022Review
- The shades of grey in adipose tissue reprogramming.Bioscience reports · 2022Review
- An Anticipatory Scheme for the Model Predictive Control of Circadian Phase for Expected Environmental Light Changes.IEEE control systems letters · 2022Article
- The role of circadian clock in astrocytes: From cellular functions to ischemic stroke therapeutic targets.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Circa-SCOPE: high-throughput live single-cell imaging method for analysis of circadian clock resetting.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Synergies of Multiple Zeitgebers Tune Entrainment.Frontiers in network physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The molecular circadian clock is driven by interlocked transcriptional-translational feedback loops, producing oscillations in the expressions of genes and proteins to coordinate the timing of biological processes throughout the body. Modeling this system gives insight into the underlying processes driving oscillations in an activator-repressor architecture and allows us to make predictions about how to manipulate these oscillations. The knockdown or upregulation of different cellular components using small molecules can disrupt these rhythms, causing a phase shift, and we aim to determine the dosing of such molecules with a model-based control strategy. Mathematical models allow us to predict the phase response of the circadian clock to these interventions and time them appropriately but only if the model has enough physiological detail to describe these responses while maintaining enough simplicity for online optimization. We build a control-relevant, physiologically-based model of the two main feedback loops of the mammalian molecular clock, which provides sufficient detail to consider multi-input control. Our model captures experimentally observed peak to trough ratios, relative abundances, and phase differences in the model species, and we independently validate this model by showing that the in silico model reproduces much of the behavior that is observed in vitro under genetic knockout conditions. Because our model produces valid phase responses, it can be used in a model predictive control algorithm to determine inputs to shift phase. Our model allows us to consider multi-input control through small molecules that act on both feedback loops, and we find that changes to the parameters of the negative feedback loop are much stronger inputs for shifting phase. The strongest inputs predicted by this model provide targets for new experimental small molecules and suggest that the function of the positive feedback loop is to stabilize the oscillations while linking the circadian system to other clock-controlled processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.