Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236323›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Postoperative Outcome of Surgery with Pancreatic Resection for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Results of a Retrospective Bicentric Analysis on 50 Consecutive Patients.

Meredith Flacs, Matthieu Faron, Olivier Mir, Fadila Mihoubi, Isabelle Sourouille, Leila Haddag-Miliani, Sarah Dumont, Philippe Terrier, Antonin Levy, Bertrand Dousset and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith FlacsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114, rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Matthieu FaronDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114, rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Olivier MirDepartment of Ambulatory Care, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Fadila MihoubiDepartment of Radiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Isabelle SourouilleDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114, rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Leila Haddag-MilianiDepartment of Radiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Sarah DumontDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Philippe TerrierDepartment of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Antonin LevyDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Bertrand DoussetDepartment of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France.
Pascaline Boudou-RouquetteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France.
Axel Le CesneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Sébastien GaujouxDepartment of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Pitié-Salpétriere Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1072-7639
Charles HonoréDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114, rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France. charles.honore@gustaveroussy.fr.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRHôpital Cochin · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsMultivisceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) during which pancreas resection may be necessary.

methodsAll consecutive patients operated for RPS with pancreatectomy in 2 expert centers between 1993 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsFifty patients (median age: 57 years, IQR: [46-65]) with a primary (n = 33) or recurrent (n = 17) RPS underwent surgery requiring pancreas resection (distal pancreatectomy (DP) (n = 43), pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (n = 5), central pancreatectomy (n = 1), and atypical resection (n = 1)). Severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) was observed in 14 patients (28%), and 7 of them (14%) required reoperation for anastomotic bowel leakage (n = 5), gastric volvulus (n = 1), or hemorrhage (n = 1). Pancreas-related complications occurred in 25 patients (50%): 10 postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) (grade A (n = 12), grade B (n = 6), grade C (n = 1)), 13 delayed gastric emptying (grade A (n = 8), grade B (n = 4), grade C (n = 1)), 1 hemorrhage (grade C). Postoperative mortality was 4% (n = 2), all following PD, caused by a massive intraoperative air embolism and by a multiple organ failure after anastomotic leakage. Pathological analysis confirmed pancreatic involvement in 17 (34%) specimens. Microscopically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 22 (44%) patients. After a follow-up of 60 months, 36 patients (75%) were still alive, among whom 27 without recurrence (56%).

conclusionPancreatic resection during RPS surgery is associated with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. PD should be avoided whenever possible while other procedures seemed achievable without excessive morbidity and with long-term survival.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsSarcomaHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesMorbidityPancreasPancreatectomyRetroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33236323
OpenAlexW3107199043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.