Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239637›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Arousal influences olfactory abilities in adults with different degree of food neophobia.

Leonardo Menghi, Iuliia Khomenko, Michele Pedrotti, Danny Cliceri, Eugenio Aprea, Isabella Endrizzi, Annachiara Cavazzana, Franco Biasioli, Davide Giacalone, Flavia Gasperi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Arousal and the modulation of sensory experience: evidence from food-related emotions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Leonardo MenghiCenter Agriculture Food Environment, University of Trento, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Iuliia KhomenkoDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Michele PedrottiDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Danny CliceriDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Eugenio ApreaCenter Agriculture Food Environment, University of Trento, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Isabella EndrizziDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Annachiara CavazzanaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Franco BiasioliDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Davide GiacaloneDepartment of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark.
Flavia GasperiCenter Agriculture Food Environment, University of Trento, Via E. Mach, 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy. flavia.gasperi@unitn.it.
Fondazione Edmund Mach · ITUniversity of Trento · ITTU Dresden · DEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food neophobia, i.e., the aversion to novel foods, and olfaction are both factors strongly affecting food choices. Mounting evidence suggests a higher arousal towards food as a key factor underlying the reluctance to eat what is unfamiliar to us. As the role of olfaction behind this phenomenon is poorly understood, we explored the associations between food neophobia and trait anxiety, olfactory functions (odor threshold, discrimination and identification) and retronasal aroma release from a reference food in a healthy cohort of 83 adult volunteers. We grouped participants in Low-Neophobics or neophilics (n = 35), Medium-Neophobics (n = 32) and High-Neophobics (n = 16) according to the widely recognized Food Neophobia Scale. Participants with higher neophobic tendencies were found to have marginally higher trait anxiety levels than neophilics (p = 0.10). A lower global olfactory functioning and odor discrimination abilities characterized High-Neophobics, while Medium-Neophobics showed a higher odor sensitiveness than Low-Neophobics. Lastly, High-Neophobics showed a lower extent of retronasal aroma release, likely due to a shorter duration of oral processing and higher anxiety-related physiological responses (such as breathing rate). In summary, this study supports the assumption that the conflicting relationship that neophobics have with food may be led by higher levels of arousal toward foods, rather than different chemosensory functions.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderAdultAgedAnxietyArousalCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisSmellVolatile Organic CompoundsYoung AdultVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID33239637
PMCPMC7689524
OpenAlexW3106543342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.