Evidence mapPaperPMID 33253237Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Computer-based inhibitory control training in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Evidence for behavioral and neural impact.

Kristin N Meyer, Rosario Santillana, Brian Miller, Wes Clapp, Marcus Way, Katrina Bridgman-Goines, Margaret A Sheridan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03363568 (Neuroplasticity Technology for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03363568 nacompletednot on this map

Neuroplasticity Technology for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Children's HospitalRan2013 to 2014Enrolled41ConditionsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderArmsAdaptive Inhibitory Control Training, Non-adaptive Inhibitory Control Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin N MeyerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0190-7678
Rosario SantillanaDavis Medical School, University of California, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Brian MillerNeuroScouting, LLC, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Wes ClappNeuroScouting, LLC, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Marcus WayAmazon, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7310-8325
Katrina Bridgman-GoinesEmory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Margaret A SheridanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0745-4342
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAmazon (United States) · USEmory University · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH092555NIMH NIH HHS R43 MH095282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most commonly diagnosed psychological disorder of childhood. Medication and cognitive behavioral therapy are effective treatments for many children; however, adherence to medication and therapy regimens is low. Thus, identifying effective adjunct treatments is imperative. Previous studies exploring computerized training programs as supplementary treatments have targeted working memory or attention. However, many lines of research suggest inhibitory control (IC) plays a central role in ADHD pathophysiology, which makes IC a potential intervention target. In this randomized control trial (NCT03363568), we target IC using a modified stop-signal task (SST) training designed by NeuroScouting, LLC in 40 children with ADHD, aged 8 to 11 years. Children were randomly assigned to adaptive treatment (n = 20) or non-adaptive control (n = 20) with identical stimuli and task goals. Children trained at home for at least 5 days a week (about 15m/day) for 4-weeks. Relative to the control group, the treatment group showed decreased relative theta power in resting EEG and trending improvements in parent ratings of attention (i.e. decreases in inattentive behaviors). Both groups showed improved SST performance. There was not evidence for treatment effects on hyperactivity or teacher ratings of symptoms. Results suggest training IC alone has potential to positively impact symptoms of ADHD and provide evidence for neural underpinnings of this impact (change in theta power; change in N200 latency). This shows promising initial results for the use of computerized training of IC in children with ADHD as a potential adjunct treatment option for children with ADHD.

Indexed as

BehaviorComputersNeural InhibitionAge FactorsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrainChildElectrodesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleParentsResearch ReportTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33253237
PMCPMC7703966
OpenAlexW3106587211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.