ArticleVeterinary world2020
Isolation and characterization of
Article in Veterinary world, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological insights into virulence and antimicrobial resistance ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Resistome, Virulome, and Pathogenicity ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- A review of antimicrobial usage practice in livestock and poultry production and its consequences on human and animal health.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Review
- Monitoring the genetic variation of some Escherichia coli strains in wild birds and cattle.The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research · 2023Article
- Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in imported meat products from Saudi Arabian ports in 2017.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Molecular serotyping of Shiga toxin-producingVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimCattle are the main reservoir of MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 257 rectal swabs were collected from 15 different organized and unorganized dairy farms of Pune during the period, January-March 2015. The screening involved enrichment in EC broth followed by differential identification on MacConkey sorbitol agar. The presumptive positive isolates were further confirmed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers specific to
resultsOut of the 257 samples analyzed, 1.9% (2/105) were positive for O157:H7 and 39% (41/105) were positive for VTEC. Two PCR confirmed positive O157:H7 strains and two randomly selected PCR-positive VT strains exhibited
conclusionThese findings reveal the presence of pathogenic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.