Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33282818›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2020

The Importance of Taking a Patient-Centered, Community-Based Approach to Preventing and Managing Frailty: A Public Health Perspective.

Kadjo Yves Cedric Adja, Jacopo Lenzi, Duygu Sezgin, Rónán O'Caoimh, Mara Morini, Gianfranco Damiani, Alessandra Buja, Maria Pia Fantini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Remote Exercise on Physical Function in Pre-Frail Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kadjo Yves Cedric AdjaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jacopo LenziDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Duygu SezginSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine Nursing & Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Rónán O'CaoimhMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland.
Mara MoriniItalian Scientific Society of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine - Primary Care Group, Bologna, Italy.
Gianfranco DamianiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra BujaLaboratory of Health Care Services and Health Promotion, Evaluation Unit of Hygiene and Public Health Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Maria Pia FantiniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the world, life expectancy is increasing. However, the years of life gained do not always correspond to healthy life years, potentially leading to an increase in frailty. Given the extent of population aging, the association between frailty and age and the impact of frailty on adverse outcomes for older people, frailty is increasingly being recognized to be a significant public health concern. Early identification of the condition is important to help older adults regain function and to prevent the negative outcomes associated with the syndrome. Despite the importance of diagnosing frailty, there is no definitive evidence or consensus of whether screening should be routinely implemented. A broad range of screening and assessment instruments have been developed taking a biopsychosocial approach, characterizing frailty as a dynamic state resulting from deficits in any of the physical, psychological and social domains, which contribute to health. All these aspects of frailty should be identified and addressed using an integrated and holistic approach to care. To achieve this goal, public health and primary health care (PHC) need to become the fulcrum through which care is offered, not only to older people and those that are frail, but to all individuals, favoring a life-course and patient-centered approach centered around integrated, community-based care. Public health personnel should be trained to address frailty not merely from a clinical perspective, but also in a societal context. Interventions should be delivered in the individuals' environment and within their social networks. Furthermore, public health professionals should contribute to education and training on frailty at a community level, fostering community-based interventions to support older adults and their caregivers to prevent and manage frailty. The purpose of this paper is to offer an overview of the concept of frailty for a public health audience in order to raise awareness of the multidimensional aspects of frailty and on how these should be addressed using an integrated and holistic approach to care.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overAgingHumansLife ExpectancyPatient-Centered CarePublic Healthbiopsychosocial (BPS) model multidisciplinaryfrailtyholistic care courseprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33282818
PMCPMC7689262

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.