ArticleMedicine2020
The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A protocol of randomized controlled trial.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of biomaterial efficacy and future directions for personalized sports medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous platelet concentrate (contain a large number of growth factors), has been widely investigated in healing and rebuilding the bone and tendon tissue. The objective of this prospective randomized research is to study and then compare the long-term effectiveness of the repair of arthroscopic rotator cuff without and with the platelet-rich plasma. It is assumed that there is no difference in the clinical results between patients receiving the repair of arthroscopic rotator cuff and the patients who do not receive PRP enhancement.
methodsThis current study is a prospective, single-center, controlled, and randomized experiment. This study was reviewed and permitted via the institutional review committee of our hospital. All the patients will receive the written informed consent in order to involve in our clinical experiment. Patients were selected from the patients who received the repair of arthroscopic rotator cuff. Patients who meet the following conditions will be included in this study: ages ranges from 18 to 55; patients with complete tear of rotator cuff confirmed during operation; the patients agreed to wear the abduction stent for 4 weeks after operation; the preoperative count of platelet count is >150,000. All patients were evaluated at follow-up and baseline for the scores of Constant-Murley (CM) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the numerical rating scale (NRS), and retear rate. The analysis is implemented with the SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), the significance level remain at P < .05.
conclusionsThe results of this study will provide useful new information on whether PRP is effective in the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair patients.
trial registrationThis study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6108).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.