Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286201›Full record

ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Fifteen Years of Gene Set Analysis for High-Throughput Genomic Data: A Review of Statistical Approaches and Future Challenges.

Samarendra Das, Craig J McClain, Shesh N Rai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samarendra DasDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0263-7027
Craig J McClainDepartment of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7219-8939
Shesh N RaiSchool of Interdisciplinary and Graduate Studies, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.

Funding

Role of oxidized linoleic acid metabolites in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver diseaseP20GM113226 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HOOD, JOSHUA L. · 2016 to 2025
$24.1M
The Role of Nutrition in the Development/Progression of Alcohol-Induced Organ InjuryP50AA024337 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI CRAIG J. MCCLAIN · 2016 to 2026
$17.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS 5P50AA024337NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM113226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, gene set analysis has become the first choice for gaining insights into underlying complex biology of diseases through gene expression and gene association studies. It also reduces the complexity of statistical analysis and enhances the explanatory power of the obtained results. Although gene set analysis approaches are extensively used in gene expression and genome wide association data analysis, the statistical structure and steps common to these approaches have not yet been comprehensively discussed, which limits their utility. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview, statistical structure and steps of gene set analysis approaches used for microarrays, RNA-sequencing and genome wide association data analysis. Further, we also classify the gene set analysis approaches and tools by the type of genomic study, null hypothesis, sampling model and nature of the test statistic, etc. Rather than reviewing the gene set analysis approaches individually, we provide the generation-wise evolution of such approaches for microarrays, RNA-sequencing and genome wide association studies and discuss their relative merits and limitations. Here, we identify the key biological and statistical challenges in current gene set analysis, which will be addressed by statisticians and biologists collectively in order to develop the next generation of gene set analysis approaches. Further, this study will serve as a catalog and provide guidelines to genome researchers and experimental biologists for choosing the proper gene set analysis approach based on several factors.

Indexed as

competitivegene set analysisgenome wide association studymicroarraysnull hypothesisRNA-sequencingsampling modelself-contained

Identifiers

PMID33286201
PMCPMC7516904

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.