Evidence mapPaperPMID 33292754Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

The PLANES study: a protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study of the placental growth factor (PlGF) blood test-informed care versus standard care alone for women with a small for gestational age fetus at or after 32 + 0 weeks' gestation.

Joanna Gent, Sian Bullough, Jane Harrold, Richard Jackson, Kerry Woolfall, Lazaros Andronis, Louise Kenny, Christine Cornforth, Alexander E P Heazell, Emily Benbow and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna GentHarris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-4871
Sian BulloughHarris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jane HarroldHarris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Richard JacksonLiverpool Clinical Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Kerry WoolfallDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lazaros AndronisDivision of Health Sciences and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Louise KennyFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Christine CornforthHarris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alexander E P HeazellMaternal and Fetal Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, 5th Floor (Research), St Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Emily BenbowHarris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Zarko AlfirevicHarris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew SharpHarris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. asharp@liv.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2013-13-009Research for Patient Benefit Programme PB-PG-0817-20021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStillbirth remains a major concern across the globe and in some high-resource countries, such as the UK; efforts to reduce the rate have achieved only modest reductions. One third of stillborn babies are small for gestational age (SGA), and these pregnancies are also at risk of neonatal adverse outcomes and lifelong health problems, especially when delivered preterm. Current UK clinical guidance advocates regular monitoring and early term delivery of the SGA fetus; however, the most appropriate regimen for surveillance of these babies remains unclear and often leads to increased intervention for a large number of these women. This pilot trial will determine the feasibility of a large-scale trial refining the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in SGA pregnancies using biomarkers of placental function sFlt-1/PlGF, identifying and intervening in only those deemed at highest risk of stillbirth.

methodsPLANES is a randomised controlled feasibility study of women with an SGA fetus that will be conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in the UK. Once identified on ultrasound, women will be randomised into two groups in a 3:1 ratio in favour of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio led management vs standard care. Women with an SGA fetus and a normal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio will have a repeat ultrasound and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio every 2 weeks with planned birth delayed until 40 weeks. In those women with an SGA fetus and an abnormal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, we will offer birth from 37 weeks or sooner if there are other concerning features on ultrasound. Women assigned to standard care will have an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio taken, but the results will be concealed from the clinical team, and the woman's pregnancy will be managed as per the local NHS hospital policy. This integrated mixed method study will also involve a health economic analysis and a perspective work package exploring trial feasibility through interviews and questionnaires with participants, their partners, and clinicians. DISCUSSION: Our aim is to determine feasibility through the assessment of our ability to recruit and retain participants to the study. Results from this pilot study will inform the design of a future large randomised controlled trial that will be adequately powered for adverse pregnancy outcome. Such a study would provide the evidence needed to guide future management of the SGA fetus.

trial registrationISRCTN58254381 . Registered on 4 July 2019.

Indexed as

Fetal growth restriction (FGR)Intrauterine growth restrictionPlacentaPlacental growth factorSmall for gestational age (SGA)Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase

Identifiers

PMID33292754
PMCPMC7677818
OpenAlexW3103690538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.