Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33297456›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Process Evaluation Examining the Performance, Adherence, and Acceptability of a Physical Activity and Diet Artificial Intelligence Virtual Health Assistant.

Courtney R Davis, Karen J Murphy, Rachel G Curtis, Carol A Maher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Courtney R DavisCity East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Karen J MurphyCity East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Rachel G CurtisCity East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Carol A MaherCity East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence virtual health assistants are a promising emerging technology. This study is a process evaluation of a 12-week pilot physical activity and diet program delivered by virtual assistant "Paola". This single-arm repeated measures study (

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDietExerciseAgedHumansMiddle AgedMotivationVegetableschatbotconversational agentinterventionlifestyleMediterranean dietphysical activityprocess evaluationvirtual health assistant

Identifiers

PMID33297456
PMCPMC7729471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.