ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Prioritizing genes for systematic variant effect mapping.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiomyocyte vulnerability to lamin polymer disruption revealed by saturation mutagenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Saturation genome editing maps the functional spectrum of pathogenic VHL alleles.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Multimodal framework to resolve variants of uncertain significance inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Accurate Prediction of Transcriptional Activity of Single Missense Variants in HIV Tat with Deep Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Lynch syndrome, molecular mechanisms and variant classification.British journal of cancer · 2023Review
- Multi-objective prioritization of genes for high-throughput functional assays towards improved clinical variant classification.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023Article
- Functional network motifs defined through integration of protein-protein and genetic interactions.PeerJ · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
motivationWhen rare missense variants are clinically interpreted as to their pathogenicity, most are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Although functional assays can provide strong evidence for variant classification, such results are generally unavailable. Multiplexed assays of variant effect can generate experimental 'variant effect maps' that score nearly all possible missense variants in selected protein targets for their impact on protein function. However, these efforts have not always prioritized proteins for which variant effect maps would have the greatest impact on clinical variant interpretation.
resultsHere, we mined databases of clinically interpreted variants and applied three strategies, each building on the previous, to prioritize genes for systematic functional testing of missense variation. The strategies ranked genes (i) by the number of unique missense VUS that had been reported to ClinVar; (ii) by movability- and reappearance-weighted impact scores, to give extra weight to reappearing, movable VUS and (iii) by difficulty-adjusted impact scores, to account for the more resource-intensive nature of generating variant effect maps for longer genes. Our results could be used to guide systematic functional testing of missense variation toward greater impact on clinical variant interpretation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code available at: https://github.com/rothlab/mave-gene-prioritization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.