Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303164›Full record

ReviewTalanta2021

Review: Detection and quantification of proteins in human urine.

Sultan Aitekenov, Abduzhappar Gaipov, Rostislav Bukasov

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Talanta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04311684 (Development and Validation of Hybrid Brillouin-Raman Spectroscopy for Non-invasive Assessment of Mechano-chemical Properties of Urine Proteins as Biomarkers of Kidney Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04311684 unknown statusnot on this map

Development and Validation of Hybrid Brillouin-Raman Spectroscopy for Non-invasive Assessment of Mechano-chemical Properties of Urine Proteins as Biomarkers of Kidney Diseases

TypeobservationalSponsorNazarbayev UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled125ConditionsNephrotic SyndromeArmshybrid Brillouin-Raman spectroscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Association of UACR and UPCR with kidney failure: a pooled analysis of clinical trials.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review: Detection of Cancer Biomarkers from a Clinical Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Development of Functional Biointerface Using Mixed Zwitterionic Silatranes.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sultan AitekenovSchool of Sciences and Humanities, Department of Chemistry, Nazarbaev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Abduzhappar GaipovSchool of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Nazarbaev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Rostislav BukasovSchool of Sciences and Humanities, Department of Chemistry, Nazarbaev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. Electronic address: rostislav.bukasov@nu.edu.kz.
Nazarbayev University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive medical research showed that patients, with high protein concentration in urine, have various kinds of kidney diseases, referred to as proteinuria. Urinary protein biomarkers are useful for diagnosis of many health conditions - kidney and cardio vascular diseases, cancers, diabetes, infections. This review focuses on the instrumental quantification (electrophoresis, chromatography, immunoassays, mass spectrometry, fluorescence spectroscopy, the infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy) of proteins (the most of all albumin) in human urine matrix. Different techniques provide unique information on what constituents of the urine are. Due to complex nature of urine, a separation step by electrophoresis or chromatography are often used for proteomics study of urine. Mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the discovery and the analysis of biomarkers in urine, however, costs of the analysis are high, especially for quantitative analysis. Immunoassays, which often come with fluorescence detection, are major qualitative and quantitative tools in clinical analysis. While Infrared and Raman spectroscopies do not give extensive information about urine, they could become important tools for the routine clinical diagnostics of kidney problems, due to rapidness and low-cost. Thus, it is important to review all the applicable techniques and methods related to urine analysis. In this review, a brief overview of each technique's principle is introduced. Where applicable, research papers about protein determination in urine are summarized with the main figures of merits, such as the limit of detection, the detectable range, recovery and accuracy, when available.

Indexed as

ProteomicsUrinalysisBiomarkersHumansMass SpectrometryProteinsProteinuriaBiomarkersProteinsBiomarkersFluorescence spectroscopyHuman serum albuminImmunoassaysMass spectrometryUrine proteomics

Identifiers

PMID33303164
PMCPMC7554478
OpenAlexW3093210051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.