ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020
Lens regeneration in humans: using regenerative potential for tissue repairing.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A preliminary comparative study of peripheral capsular linear incision versus circular micro-tear capsulotomy for in situ lens regeneration.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Quantitative spatial analysis of crystallin proteins in human lens epithelial cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome-wide DNA methylation and transcriptome sequencing analyses of lens tissue in an age-related mouse cataract model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Biologically Relevant Laminin-511 Moderates the Derivation and Proliferation of Human Lens Epithelial Stem/Progenitor-Like Cells.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Through theGenes · 2024Review
- The significance of growth shells in development of symmetry, transparency, and refraction of the human lens.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Review
- A new eye lens structure associated with capsule/basement membrane growth.microPublication biology · 2024Article
- Lens regenerationiScience · 2023Article
- Formation of three-dimensional cell aggregates expressing lens-specific proteins in various cultures of human iris-derived tissue cells and iPS cells.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Article
- Nicotinamide improves in vitro lens regeneration in a mouse capsular bag model.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
- Mitotic Activation Around Wound Edges and Epithelialization Repair in UVB-Induced Capsular Cataracts.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Stem cell therapy in ocular pathologies in the past 20 years.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The crystalline lens is an important optic element in human eyes. It is transparent and biconvex, refracting light and accommodating to form a clear retinal image. The lens originates from the embryonic ectoderm. The epithelial cells at the lens equator proliferate, elongate and differentiate into highly aligned lens fiber cells, which are the structural basis for maintaining the transparency of the lens. Cataract refers to the opacity of the lens. Currently, the treatment of cataract is to remove the opaque lens and implant an intraocular lens (IOL). This strategy is inappropriate for children younger than 2 years, because a developing eyeball is prone to have severe complications such as inflammatory proliferation and secondary glaucoma. On the other hand, the absence of the crystalline lens greatly affects visual function rehabilitation. The researchers found that mammalian lenses possess regenerative potential. We identified lens stem cells through linear tracking experiments and designed a minimally invasive lens-content removal surgery (MILS) to remove the opaque lens material while preserving the lens capsule, stem cells and microenvironment. In infants with congenital cataract, functional lens regeneration in situ can be observed after MILS, and the prognosis of visual function is better than that of traditional surgery. Because of insufficient regenerative ability in humans, the morphology and volume of the regenerated lens cannot reach the level of a normal lens. The activation, proliferation and differentiation of lens stem cells and the alignment of lens fibers are regulated by epigenetic factors, growth factors, transcription factors, immune system and other signals and their interactions. The construction of appropriate microenvironment can accelerate lens regeneration and improve its morphology. The therapeutic concept of MILS combined with microenvironment manipulation to activate endogenous stem cells for functional regeneration of organs in situ can be extended to other tissues and organs with strong self-renewal and repair ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.