Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33327487›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Self-Quantification Systems to Support Physical Activity: From Theory to Implementation Principles.

Paul Dulaud, Ines Di Loreto, Denis Mottet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul DulaudTech-CICO (Technologies for Cooperation, Interaction, and Knowledge, in Collectives), Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 Rue Marie Curie, 10000 Troyes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7236-9355
Ines Di LoretoTech-CICO (Technologies for Cooperation, Interaction, and Knowledge, in Collectives), Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 Rue Marie Curie, 10000 Troyes, France.
Denis MottetEuromov Digital Health in Motion, Université de Montpellier, IMT Mines Alès, 700 av. Pic St Loup, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7564-5394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the emergence of the quantified self movement, users aim at health behavior change, but only those who are sufficiently motivated and competent with the tools will succeed. Our literature review shows that theoretical models for quantified self exist but they are too abstract to guide the design of effective user support systems. Here, we propose principles linking theory and implementation to arrive at a hierarchical model for an adaptable and personalized self-quantification system for physical activity support. We show that such a modeling approach should include a multi-factors user model (activity, context, personality, motivation), a hierarchy of multiple time scales (week, day, hour), and a multi-criteria decision analysis (user activity preference, user measured activity, external parameters). This theoretical groundwork, which should facilitate the design of more effective solutions, has now to be validated by further empirical research.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorPhysical Conditioning, HumanHumansMotivationbehavior changehealthmodelpersuasive designphysical activityquantified selfsupport systemuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID33327487
PMCPMC7764987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.