Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33328739›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2020

Prognostic Value of the Preoperative Lymphocyte-to-C-Reactive Protein Ratio and Albumin-to-Globulin Ratio in Patients with Osteosarcoma.

Hongzhi Hu, Xiangtian Deng, Qingcheng Song, Hongzhi Lv, Wei Chen, Xin Xing, Jian Zhu, Zhanchao Tan, Xiaodong Cheng, Baichuan Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Can C-reactive protein-based biomarkers be used as predictive of 30-day mortality in elderly hip fractures?A retrospective study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hongzhi Hu *Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China.
Xiangtian Deng *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.
Qingcheng Song *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2841-4021
Hongzhi LvDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.
Xin XingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.
Jian ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.
Zhanchao TanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.
Xiaodong ChengDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China.
Baichuan WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China.
Zengwu ShaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China.
Yingze ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGrowing evidence indicates that preoperative biomarkers could be identified as independent prognostic factors in various cancers. The purpose of this study was to assess prognostic value of the preoperative lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in patients with osteosarcoma.

methodsA total of 137 osteosarcoma patients treated at our hospital between 2011 and 2019 were enrolled in the study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. The optimal cutoff values of LCR, AGR, LMR, and CAR were assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were employed to determine the independent prognostic factors. The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to evaluate relative risk.

resultsThe optimal cutoff values of LCR, AGR, LMR, and CAR were 0.14, 1.79, 3.05 and 0.24, respectively. According to the univariate analysis, OS was remarkably associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (

conclusionThe present study provides new evidence that the preoperative LCR and AGR could serve as independent prognostic factors for patients with osteosarcoma. These findings will help physicians to stratify patients for appropriate treatment protocols and facilitate decision-making so as to improve the patients' survival condition.

Indexed as

albumin-to-globulin ratiobiomarkerC-reactive proteinlymphocyteosteosarcomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID33328739
PMCPMC7734047

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.