Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33334418›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020

Reliability of Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements and Correlation With Left Ventricular Mass.

Joseph E Schwartz, Paul Muntner, Ian M Kronish, Matthew M Burg, Thomas G Pickering, John Thomas Bigger, Daichi Shimbo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05291143 (The Effectiveness of Short Videos on Knowledge of Proper Home Blood Pressure Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05291143 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Short Videos on Knowledge of Proper Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) Among Malaysian Medical Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Putra MalaysiaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled87ConditionsHypertension, Blood PressureArmsShort videos on blood pressure monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Updates in the 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guideline.Current hypertension reports · 2026
    Review
  9. Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review.American journal of hypertension · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Implementation of Remote Patient Monitoring for Hypertension Management.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessment of blood pressure variability: characteristics and comparison of blood pressure measurement methods.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Performance of wearable watch-type home blood pressure measurement devices in a real-world clinical sample.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph E SchwartzCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. Electronic address: Joseph.Schwartz@StonyBrookMedicine.edu.
Paul MuntnerDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Ian M KronishCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Matthew M BurgDepartments of Internal Medicine and Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Thomas G PickeringCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
John Thomas BiggerCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Daichi ShimboCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
WORKSITE BLOOD PRESSURE STUDYP01HL047540 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH E · 1993 to 2014
$27.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL047540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining the reliability and predictive validity of office blood pressure (OBP), ambulatory BP (ABP), and home BP (HBP) can inform which is best for diagnosing hypertension and estimating risk of cardiovascular disease.

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the reliability of OBP, HBP, and ABP and evaluate their associations with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in untreated persons.

methodsThe Improving the Detection of Hypertension (IDH) study, a community-based observational study, enrolled 408 participants who had OBP assessed at 3 visits, and completed 3 weeks of HBP, 2 24-h ABP recordings, and a 2-dimensional echocardiogram. Mean age was 41.2 ± 13.1 years, 59.5% were women, 25.5% African American, and 64.0% Hispanic.

resultsThe reliability of 1 week of HBP, 3 office visits with mercury sphygmomanometry, and 24-h ABP were 0.938, 0.894, and 0.846 for systolic and 0.918, 0.847, and 0.843 for diastolic BP, respectively. The correlations among OBP, HBP, and ABP, corrected for regression dilution bias, were 0.74 to 0.89. After multivariable adjustment including OBP and 24-h ABP, 10 mm Hg higher systolic and diastolic HBP were associated with 5.07 (standard error [SE]: 1.48) and 3.92 (SE: 2.14) g/m

conclusionsOBP, HBP, and ABP assess somewhat distinct parameters. Compared with OBP (3 visits) or 24-h ABP, systolic and diastolic HBP (1 week) were more reliable and more strongly associated with LVMI. These data suggest that 1 week of HBP monitoring may be the best approach for diagnosing hypertension.

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesHypertensionAdultBlood Pressure DeterminationBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryEchocardiographyEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleOffice VisitsOrgan SizePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Resultsambulatory blood pressurehome blood pressureleft ventricular mass indexoffice blood pressureregression dilution biasreliability

Identifiers

PMID33334418
PMCPMC7749264
OpenAlexW3111512437

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.