Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339840›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Differential proteomic analysis by SWATH-MS unravels the most dominant mechanisms underlying yeast adaptation to non-optimal temperatures under anaerobic conditions.

Tânia Pinheiro, Ka Ying Florence Lip, Estéfani García-Ríos, Amparo Querol, José Teixeira, Walter van Gulik, José Manuel Guillamón, Lucília Domingues

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Engineering thermotolerant microbial strains viaEngineering microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deletion ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Current Ethanol Production Requirements for the YeastInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Review
  10. EngineeredBioengineered · 2020
    Review
  11. Selection and subsequent physiological characterization of industrialBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tânia PinheiroCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Ka Ying Florence LipDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands.
Estéfani García-RíosFood Biotechnology Department, Instituto de Agroquímica Y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Amparo QuerolFood Biotechnology Department, Instituto de Agroquímica Y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
José TeixeiraCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Walter van GulikDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands.
José Manuel GuillamónFood Biotechnology Department, Instituto de Agroquímica Y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Lucília DominguesCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal. luciliad@deb.uminho.pt.
University of Minho · PTDelft University of Technology · NLInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidation of temperature tolerance mechanisms in yeast is essential for enhancing cellular robustness of strains, providing more economically and sustainable processes. We investigated the differential responses of three distinct Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, an industrial wine strain, ADY5, a laboratory strain, CEN.PK113-7D and an industrial bioethanol strain, Ethanol Red, grown at sub- and supra-optimal temperatures under chemostat conditions. We employed anaerobic conditions, mimicking the industrial processes. The proteomic profile of these strains in all conditions was performed by sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spectra-mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS), allowing the quantification of 997 proteins, data available via ProteomeXchange (PXD016567). Our analysis demonstrated that temperature responses differ between the strains; however, we also found some common responsive proteins, revealing that the response to temperature involves general stress and specific mechanisms. Overall, sub-optimal temperature conditions involved a higher remodeling of the proteome. The proteomic data evidenced that the cold response involves strong repression of translation-related proteins as well as induction of amino acid metabolism, together with components related to protein folding and degradation while, the high temperature response mainly recruits amino acid metabolism. Our study provides a global and thorough insight into how growth temperature affects the yeast proteome, which can be a step forward in the comprehension and improvement of yeast thermotolerance.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnaerobiosisFermentationMass SpectrometryProteomeProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTemperatureThermotoleranceWineProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33339840
PMCPMC7749138
OpenAlexW3118014772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.